Clipmarks
TheCatWhispererfollowshare
3-14-2006 1:15 PM
579 views
Ok, so I am usually all for the game makers and thier right to sell games. But in this case, I am on the fence, and even leaning towards supporting the schoolboard. This game is obviously targeted at teens. And the rating it will get will be M (for Mature, meaning you must be at least 17 to buy it). That being said, is Rockstar responsible if violence happens as a result of kids playing this game? Or are parents responsible here too?

One can argue that GTA was always meant as an "Adult" game, that Rockstar never intended for it to fall into the hands of children. But this game, "Bully" takes place in a private school, and seems to be aimed at senior high school grade kids. (Most kids are about to enter university at 17, the legal age to buy an M rated game).

Personally, I think this game is in just bad taste, and Rockstar is just asking for trouble. Why make this game?

Again, I'm usually for the game industry and hate the idea of games being censored. Not here though
24 Comments   | Add a Comment
3-14-2006 1:26 PM
jfriedland
I have to side with the school board on this one. While they're at it, they should boycott Grand Theft Auto too.
3-14-2006 1:37 PM
TheCatWhisperer
Yes, schools should encourage parents to think twice about buying GTA fro the little ones, but I'm not sure a boycott is the answer. There is nothing wrong with violent video games as long as the user is able to identify that it is not real and that such behaviour is un-acceptable in a civilized society.

I play lots of semi-violent to violent video games, but I'd never even think twice about acting out a scene from GTA, or any of the others I've played.

The real issue is whether or not these games are being targeted at our youth. If they are, then that must stop, but so should targeting most advertising to our youth. Look at MTV.. look at all the Ads targeted at young girls to be "thi...
3-14-2006 1:39 PM
Guillaume
I am not a teen (I'm 31), but I think this game will be very fun to play. Usually Rockstar makes very good games anyway.
3-14-2006 1:40 PM
TheCatWhisperer
I don't disagree with the fact that Rockstar makes fun games... Just with who they are seeming to target this latest one at
3-14-2006 1:46 PM
Guillaume
Well obviously, I'm part of the target, because I will buy it
3-14-2006 1:52 PM
TheCatWhisperer
You got that right.. "part" of the target... Youth (those under 17) seem to be the majority of the target for this one. That is what I have an issue with.
3-14-2006 1:58 PM
Guillaume
Honnestly, you think kids will start to behave like that in real life because they play it in a game ? Some time ago, I saw a 11-yo distant cousin of mine playing some war FPS game in a very (and I mean very) violent way, yelling at the screen, very aggressive and agitated, jumping on the sofa, etc. I said to myself, my, this should be a very violent kid.

1 hour later, he met us in the living room, and to my surprise, he was actually very calm, smart, funny and talkative. I think videogames are just a way of expresing our inner violence rather than in real life. It can't hurt, really, no matter what atrocities you commit in the game. It's a GAME. Young children used to have cruel and violent games since the beginning of humanity.
3-14-2006 2:06 PM
TheCatWhisperer
Good Point, and that's the way many kids are. And many more still have parents who sit and talk to them about the games or movies or videos, etc and discuss the topics with them. But not all.

The stupid thing is that in order to protect "us" from those few who will take it too far and who will not distinguish reality from fantasy, we often go to censoring everyone. That sucks. But what else can we do?

Trust me, I do not for a second think that violence IS the fault of a game or music or TV, but the fault of the individual and those around them failing to see the coming danger. Some people are just a bit off their rocker, and we all suffer for it.

Others are just ignorant and like to ...
3-14-2006 2:52 PM
jfriedland
I don't know... I just can't get behind a videogame that awards points for raping digital women (GTA, not Rockstar).
3-14-2006 3:00 PM
Guillaume
Sorry Jfriedland, I don't want to be rude, but please don't speak out of ignorance. Here are some facts:

* GTA has indeed been made by Rockstar

* You CAN'T rape anyone in any GTA games. There are even no sex AT ALL in the official games.

* The only sex parts were removed from the final game by the developers before being sold, and some hackers found ways to "reenable" them by studying the source code. Anyway, they are not, in any case, linked to rape.

* It's a dating mini-game, where you organise night outs with the girl you try to seduce, going for a bike ride, to a restaurant, go dancing, etc. Sometimes, when you come back and the night have been good and the girsl is pleased, she as...
3-14-2006 3:10 PM
TheCatWhisperer
Thanks
Guillaume, that was actually a much more clear versions of what I was writing




A
lot of people read about "Hot Coffee" and think.. oh! those evil game
developers! Granted, Rockstar could have
just removed the code and none of this silliness would have happened.



Another
think people seem to misunderstand is your point about the fact that they have
to HACK THE GAME. Especially if they try
and do it on a PS2, there is a lot of work involved to enable the sex scene on
a PS2.



On
the PC, granted, it is just a patch, but the user has to willingly download and
apply the hack, knowing that it enables the scene. So who's fault is it there? Not really the developer, regardless ...
3-14-2006 3:11 PM
TheCatWhisperer
god I hate OneNote.. sorry about the formating.. is there a way to edit a comment?
3-14-2006 3:21 PM
jklugman
CatWhisperer, nope, the Clipmarks team feels it would take away from the conversational feel of these comments, and I agree with them. Besides, it's pretty uncommon for people to make a big deal about others' typos or formatting.

Also--welcome to Clipmarks, and I like your avatar (fellow cat owner here).
3-14-2006 3:22 PM
jfriedland
Guillame,

I appreciate the clarifications. As one with no interest in videogames, especially violent ones, I will admit that I have never played, nor even seen, one of these games in action. I have, however, read several articles and legal briefs pertaining to the manufacture of GTA, so I don't feel that my comments are totally out of ignorance.

First, you were right to correct me above, as I meant to say "(GTA not Bully").

Secondly, I was not aware that hacking was required in order to be able to rape electronically. Even so, I still have a problem with a game that is conducive to this (although it does reduce my ire toward to the manufacturers).

If, as you say, the main que...
3-14-2006 3:24 PM
TheCatWhisperer
Thanks jklugman

That's my baby, Gizmo.

I'm really liking this community. Good conversation and articles, interesting people and points of view.
3-14-2006 4:33 PM
Guillaume
If, as you say, the main quest of the game is not rape (or murder?), what exactly IS the point of the game? (seriously).
Well, it's a bit complicated to explain. GTA is one of this new breed of games where there is no real simple point. It's like a parallel universe where you can do a lot of things.

Basically (you won't like it) you begin the game as a little thug, and you need to raise youself as a position of a big mafioso who run the city. Using extortion, theft, murder, violence. Fighting cops and rival mobs. Simply said, that's about it

But the interest of the game is not really in the ultimate point, it's in the means you have. You're in an incredibly big world, wi...
3-14-2006 4:45 PM
jfriedland
Guillaume, if everyone could be as sophisticated as you in their appreciation of the deeper elements of this game, I would have a much easier time digesting it. My problem is that I think there are a lot of people out there who just get off on pretending to be violent, nasty thugs. Hopefully it stays pretend...
3-15-2006 3:06 AM
Guillaume
I disagree Jfriedland. I really think videogames player are a lot more subtle about their gaming than you think. Even kids. Talk with some.

Before videogames, kids were already playing violent games. They were playing cowboys and indians, cops and thiefs, etc. The videogame is just a new media. It didn't invent violence, it just reflects it.

To me the only dangerous violence is the one targeted at persons. Not pixel characters.
3-15-2006 8:14 AM
TheCatWhisperer
Hrm, I kind of agree with both of you (jfriedland & Guillaume).

On jfriedlan's side, I agree that there ARE people out there who just want to play violent games and "get off" on them. These are the people this game is dangerous to. They don't seem to have the ability to distinguish reality from fantasy, and if they do, they don't care. These are the people who will imitate a game (Violent like GTA, or a simple racing game like Need for Speed) in the real world.

On Guillaume's side, i have to agree that the VAST majority of game players are responsible, and do not imitate the game in the real world, they know that some actions performed in the game (where you are role playing a character...
3-15-2006 10:12 AM
jfriedland
I agree that kids have always played violent games. But didn't it used to be that everyone wanted to get to be "the good guy?" (e.g. the cops in cops and robbers, the cowboys in cowboys and Indians - yes, clearly that has its own issues).

It's just depressing to see the way things change.
3-15-2006 12:55 PM
TheCatWhisperer
I always preferred to be the bad guy

How, really, have things changed?
3-15-2006 3:12 PM
jfriedland
Okay, I give up. I will continue to aspire to be the good guy. The rest of you can do as you please.
3-15-2006 3:35 PM
Guillaume
TheCatWhisperer said:

On jfriedlan's side, I agree that there ARE people out there who just want to play violent games and "get off" on them. These are the people this game is dangerous to. They don't seem to have the ability to distinguish reality from fantasy, and if they do, they don't care. These are the people who will imitate a game (Violent like GTA, or a simple racing game like Need for Speed) in the real world.
Do you really know some guys like that ? I don't. Except in republican propaganda to censor videogames. If some wacko kills someone, everyone blame the videogame he was playing before. Do they really think he wouldn't have done it if he hadn't play the game ? Come ...
3-15-2006 10:22 PM
TheCatWhisperer
Do you really know some guys like that ? I don't. Except in republican propaganda to censor videogames. If some wacko kills someone, everyone blame the videogame he was playing before. Do they really think he wouldn't have done it if he hadn't play the game ? Come on, let's be serious. We'd better ask ourselves how someone like him has access to real guns. They are dangerous. Not virtual ones.
Actually, yes I do, not to the extream that they would go on a killing spree, but they damn well do try and imitate the wrestling games (and wrestling on TV) and they DO race thier cars down the highway.. stupid, but they do it. I even herd of a guy who actually tried to imitate Projec...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK