Every living thing relies on CO2 being in the atmosphere.

That said, why do environmental alarmists oppose the CO2 scrubber? The argument that it is inefficient just doesn't fly because all technology becomes cheaper and more efficient over time.

I think we all know the reason why they oppose it. The CO2 scrubber does not allow them to control your life.

Those areas of the world where CO2 is not as abundant tend to be deserts... plants need CO2 to live. Why on earth would we want to turn the earth into a dead zone? And what would vegetarians eat?

CO2 levels in the US are also increasing; because, we are increasing the amount of forests and farm land.

CO2 is itself a natural scrubber of pollution. Concrete jungles aren't smoggy because of the CO2 emissions of cars and people, but are due to the lack of plants to scrub the atmosphere.

Ever wonder why the Smoky Mountains are called the Smoky Mountains? The trees are converting massive amounts of CO2 into oxygen. Natural scrubbing, no human intervention needed, except to breathe out more CO2...

Kills me that they are showing CO2 as a pollutant and trying to sell CO2 free air as clean.

"The CO2 scrubber does not allow them to control your life. "

Nailed it.