Clipmarks
ljsdesignfollowshare
11-12-2007 8:28 AM1805 views
ljsdesign says:
“How could they let four days pass when every minute was precious? They denied her the right to medical care, to a life.”
57 Comments   | Add a Comment
11-12-2007 8:39 AM
Aribeth
This is outrageous!
11-12-2007 8:42 AM
Deepti
11-12-2007 9:51 AM
debbyski
Every woman should have the right to terminate a pregnancy to save her own life.
11-12-2007 9:56 AM
ljsdesign
This is one of the reasons I left the Catholic Church. I don't understand why they put the lives of women at such a low value. A loving "Father" does not value his sons more than his daughters.
11-12-2007 10:06 AM
n2sooners
I am anti-abortion as a means for birth control, but I think it should always remain a legal medical procedure when it comes to saving the life of the mother. I think it should even be legal in cases where the physical health of the mother is at risk.
11-12-2007 10:16 AM
bignosemousie
Ectopic pregnancies are not viable and shouldn't fall under the abortion laws anyway.
11-12-2007 10:49 AM
n2sooners
Ectopic pregnancies are not viable
That isn't completely true, but it is true that it does put the health and even the life of the mother at risk.
11-12-2007 10:58 AM
bignosemousie
While a fetus of ectopic pregnancy is typically not viable, very rarely, an abdominal pregnancy has been salvaged.
Well, shut my mouth, n2sooners. I learned something today. Thanks!
11-12-2007 11:10 AM
n2sooners
I just happened to know that because my niece was one. She was an abdominal pregnancy that they didn't detect until the c-section. There were problems during he pregnancy, but they couldn't figure out the cause because the placenta was attached to the outside of the uterus and nothing showed up on all their tests (and they did lots of tests multiple times). Her mother did need surgery afterwards though and the bleeding did put her life at risk.
11-12-2007 11:12 AM
bignosemousie
See, kids? This is how Clipmarks makes you smarter.
11-12-2007 11:38 AM
jatfla
This is Nicaragua.
11-12-2007 11:56 AM
ljsdesign
Jatfla, could you please elaborate?
11-12-2007 4:25 PM
righthand
Don't you all know who is responsible for EVERYONE of these death? Surely you know the strings that are attached to your aid.

Some of the remarks made here are RACIST and should be withdrawn now.

These poor countries are not in any position to balance the lives of a number of unfortunate women and their families against the BLACKMAIL exerted by your government for the implementation of inhumane religious sectarian racist decrees.

How can I in Ireland know these things and you appear not to? Anyway this lack of knowledge does not excuse the RACISM. Do you think that because they are not American they love their citizen, women, mothers, wives or sisters l...
11-12-2007 4:35 PM
ljsdesign
Thank you . I took that the same way. A woman's life is a woman's life no matter what country she hails from.
11-12-2007 5:50 PM
jatfla
righthand...I will not attack President Bush for the most unfortunate,terrible death of this woman. Get a grip.

Even in the olden days, the United States did not ban abortions when the life of the mother was in danger. It is unfortunate that she lived in that country.
11-12-2007 5:51 PM
bignosemousie
I interpreted Jatfla's remark as only pointing out that this occurred in Nicaragua and not in the US. That, if there were a ban on abortions in the US, the medical care of a pregnant woman would not necessarily reflect the treatment this woman received in Nicaragua.

I sincerely doubt Jatfla is in any way racist or feels that this woman's life is any less sacred than her own.

11-12-2007 6:14 PM
righthand
I will not attack President Bush for the most unfortunate,terrible death of this woman. Get a grip. Even in the olden days, the United States did not ban abortions when the life of the mother was in danger. It is unfortunate that she lived in that country.
Bush and by extension you, are responsible for her death. Your government puts strings on aid and on abortion in particular.
This is Nicaragua.
Is racist and not your first time.
11-12-2007 6:22 PM
ljsdesign
Actually , you can thank this guy, President Daniel Ortega.
The ban has been strictly followed, leaving the country torn between a strong tradition of women’s rights and a growing religious conservatism. Abortion rights groups have stormed Congress in recent weeks demanding change, but President Daniel Ortega, a former leftist revolutionary and a Roman Catholic, has refused to oppose the church-supported ban.
11-12-2007 6:24 PM
righthand
I interpreted Jatfla's remark as only pointing out that this occurred in Nicaragua and not in the US.

If that is the best defence of her remark that you can come up with then you are no help. "...that this occurred in Nicaragua and not in the US" is your interpretation and only excuse for her remark? Are you suggesting that her remark is only for geographical reasons alone!!!

11-12-2007 6:27 PM
bignosemousie
Don't pick a fight with me righthand.
11-12-2007 6:37 PM
righthand
Actually , you can thank this guy, President Daniel Ortega.
You will find that he and other governments receiving aid from America get the aid provided they abide by US government conditions including very restrictive abortions, which should be no business of the donating country. Ortega may have his own agenda too but I believe that he may be president since the ban was introduced. I'll check.
11-12-2007 6:44 PM
righthand
Don't pick a fight with me righthand.
What is that supposed to mean? You are the one rushing blindly to defend the racist remark making her position worse with your foolish excuse.
Do you stand over her remark?
11-12-2007 6:46 PM
bignosemousie
Righthand. I wrote my interpretation of her remark. I do stand by my belief that Jatfla is not a racist.
11-12-2007 7:18 PM
Monkfishy
Religious extremism is the problem. It is no less a danger in the U.S. than in Nicaragua, Iran, or the Sudan. We shouldn't fool ourselves into thinking that this couldn't happen here.
11-12-2007 7:35 PM
FirstApostate
Is America next?
11-12-2007 8:01 PM
BitDrifter
You are the one rushing blindly to defend the racist remark
Jumping to such a conclusion with no supporting evidence to me suggests you are the racist in the room. You read jatfla comment and your thoughts were immedialtly plunged into your own racist stereotypes which you then applied to jatfla.

Any rational non-racist person would come to the more probable conclusion that jatfla was refering to the economic state of the country which can lead to many tragedies.
11-12-2007 8:11 PM
topsailangler
In searching for facts on US foriegn aide it seems US aid to Nicaragua has DECLINED in recent years despite the ban on abortions. However I couldn't find an article in a google search that directly addressed the aboartion/aid issue in regards to Nicaragua.

I did find this article though from the "other side of the isle"

CENTRAL AMERICA, August 31, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) -- Sweden announced
on Tuesday that it would sever aid to several countries that oppose its
pro-abortion policy, including Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, and
Peru.
11-12-2007 9:30 PM
jatfla
Much thanks to those who defended me. What a shock to find that my remarks merited righthand's response. Apparently he is very passionate about this issue and I appreciate his compassion for this woman, her family and the climate/culture that she lived in.

He wouldn't know me from Adam's housecat, but claims to know that I'm a racist. Hmmmm...... I'm sorry righthand, that you find my remarks sooooo offensive; to the point that you would include your response to this clip into another clip!

In agreement with a previous poster, I do not support abortion as an option to birth control and I, personally, believe that it is used as such in our Country; ie. the US. That being said, I would...
11-13-2007 6:46 AM
righthand
Any rational non-racist person would come to the more probable conclusion that jatfla was refering to the economic state of the country which can lead to many tragedies.
I interpreted Jatfla's remark as only pointing out that this occurred in Nicaragua and not in the US.
Any further interpretations of her remark other than...
Thank you . I took that the same way. A woman's life is a woman's life no matter what country she hails from.
We've had geographical and economic. Any other?
11-13-2007 6:57 AM
righthand
I was nearly 40 before our first child was born. I'm no advocate of abortion, but regard my views as private. I'm absolutely against the tying of moral question into foreign aid as is the UN and as was Clinton.

Forcing desperate countries and in particular those Latin American ones where you are already responsible for so many deaths, to accept your unchristian fundamentalist doctrine to adopt worse than in America is an poison pill of more death.

Aside from her racist remark, support for this policy is anti-female as is anyone supporting Bush in is implementation.

[i]The Christian Right's agenda...
11-13-2007 7:15 AM
righthand
I did find this article though from the "other side of the isle"
Yes, I was aware of this attempt to address the balance or imbalance. It is like when Bush came to Europe to announce his intention to place missiles in Poland supposedly to hit incoming from Asia. Russia responded as would be expected. Sometimes fire with fire although not not by preference when dealing with a warmonger like Bush as you only further encourage him. Or like Rice lecturing foreign governments on democracy when the world sees 'democracy' in action in Iraq, Israel, and at home. Such hypocrisy.

[url=http://www.madre.org/articles/usfp/christianright.5.07.html]Religious fundamentalism[/ur...
11-13-2007 7:19 AM
ljsdesign
Okay, the reason that this clip interested me, was that this is an example of what could possibly happen if "Roe vs. Wade " is reversed. There is a strong movement for it in this country.
If you refer back to the clip
Nicaragua last year became one of 35 countries that ban all abortions, even to save the life of the mother, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights in New York.
This is happening in other countries as well.I haven't had the chance to find out which countries the are yet but I will soon.

Now as topsailangler pointed out( Thanks btw)
Sweden announced
on Tuesday that it would sever aid to several countries that oppose its
[quote...
11-13-2007 7:45 AM
righthand
Jumping to such a conclusion with no supporting evidence to me suggests you are the racist in the room. You read jatfla comment and your thoughts were immedialtly plunged into your own racist stereotypes which you then applied to jatfla.
I was hardly bothered dealing with this swiftboating slander. Require the hero to prove the level of his heroism while the commander-in-chief is AWOL holding up a bar. When I saw the source of this pathetic overused fascist Nazi device I rubbed my hands with glee, but left the best to last.

Yesterday 4:38 PM jatfla77
This is Nicaragua.
Yesterday 4:56 PM ljsdesign38
Jatfla, could you please elaborate? [/quo...
11-13-2007 12:58 PM
BitDrifter
righthand, you are odviously a racist in denial. You don't even realise it when your racist assumptions are just that, racist.

It is sad there are so many racists still around.
11-13-2007 2:49 PM
righthand
I was hardly bothered dealing with this swiftboating slander. Require the hero to prove the level of his heroism while the commander-in-chief is AWOL, holding up a bar. I saw the source of this pathetic overused fascist Nazi device.
Still some RATS left. Always some left feeding on the führer's scraps. Don't you get it? The emperor has NO cloths. None. His Nazi pedigree has been exposed. My guess is that you would have been a prime candidate for disposal when the original was still kicking about. Were you the one painting up swastikas to switch attention from the racial attack on blacks.

[url=/clipmark/8899C695-20CF-49F4-B9B0-1B8AC1CF27DA/]White America[b]...
11-13-2007 3:46 PM
BitDrifter
Classic denial, you are the new breed of racist. Your mind is filled with nothing but racist stereotypes. So when others say something as innocuous as a name of a country, your racist mind floods with the racial stereotypes that are ingrained in you, and then automatically assume that the commenter is as racist as you, and being of the new breed of racists you attack so you can try portray to the world a non-racist facade.
11-13-2007 7:12 PM
righthand
The other part of the swiftboating where you require the hero to prove the degree of his heroism while his opponent the treacherous coward held up the bars in a drunken stumper during war, is to keep repeating the lie over and over and over in the hope that someone will listen. Not working now?

You will note that each of my replies gets stronger while yours is just repetitive and boring. Try expanding on your new theory as to how you believe I'm racist. Failing that, some evidence of your charge of racism could ensure some interest in your hopeless pathetic defence of your racist comrade.
We've had geographical and economic. Any other?
Which is yours or have you a new excuse?
11-13-2007 7:37 PM
BitDrifter
There is no need to expand on my theory that you are a modern racist, nor strengthen my already concrete case of your racism.

I hope one day you will recognize you are a racist, so that you can then hopefully accept that you are racist and lastly overcome it.

Maybe my comments here will help lead you to the first stage, recognition. My thoughts are with you righthand, I have faith that you will overcome your racism.
11-14-2007 1:25 AM
zizzy
Righthand -you will never persuade thinkers like BitDrifter. His calling you a "new racist" is a tactic of white supremacy / privilege and their allies. It's a deceit, a trick of language, the usage of which came to the forefront during the Reagan years. To call you a "new racist," is to change the subject, take the focus off of Jafta and make you the issue.

Jafta's comment,"This is Nicaragua," is a signal to like-thinkers. It's the kind of comment that would not be made in a room full of Nicaraguans who would demand an explanation of Jafta's meaning and motives. And if so made, there would be much back-peddling on Jafta's part. No, comments of this type are uttered and written in the secure environment of like-minds.
11-14-2007 1:29 AM
zizzy
BitDrifter - About Me

I am an independent minded, conservative leaning, nationalist, programmer.

I checked his (her?) profile after I wrote the post. Conservative. Nationalist. A self-identification that speaks for itself.
11-14-2007 2:33 AM
BitDrifter
To call you a "new racist," is to change the subject, take the focus off of Jafta and make you the issue.
How perseptive you are. That is exactly what I was doing. I was changing the subject from jatfla to the true racist on this thread. I applaud your ability to state the odvious. Although if I were righthand I would be offended that you felt the need to explain that to him.

I checked his (her?) profile after I wrote the post. Conservative. Nationalist. A self-identification that speaks for itself.
LOL!
11-14-2007 6:35 AM
zizzy
Bit - You are such a mark. Speaking for Righthand. Defending Righthand. Deflecting attention from yourself. And now trying to turning the tables on me. What a poor chess game you play.
11-14-2007 6:40 AM
zizzy
"How perseptive you are. That is exactly what I was doing."

If true, then how you just revealed your true self.

If not, ditto.
11-14-2007 8:11 AM
jatfla
My goodness, this clip has been busy and I've become the most vicious of all racists.

I explained my comment concerning "This is Nicaragua." I stand by it.

Concerning my profile...when did "...lover of my Country..." become racist. I didn't say "Conservative" (though I am and no apologies offered) or "Nationalist", and I don't see where that's a bad thing either. But you put words into my profile which are not there. You are making assumptions based on current characterizations. What I am not is a globalist or a racist.

But ya'll sure have had fun with my identity in cyberspace.
11-14-2007 10:38 AM
zizzy
Jatfla - the conservative and nationalist is on Bitdrifters profile - reread the comment. I never mentioned your user name.

Of course you standby your comment - how could you do otherwise?

Bit and Jatfla - too clever for their own good. LOL!
11-14-2007 12:20 PM
jatfla
"I checked his (her?) profile...". Thank you for your clarification. It was difficult to understand who you were speaking about.
11-14-2007 12:42 PM
BitDrifter
zizzy, zizzy, poor man. I really had no idea you had reading comprehension problems. I am sorry, it must be a difficult problem to have when using this particular medium. Let me point out some of your problems, and maybe it can help you in the future.


Speaking for Righthand.
I never spoke for righthand. I would have to say something like this:

"Righthand will be offended by your comments suggesting he is a fool who needs my comments explained to him by you."


Defending Righthand.
I never defended righthand, In fact I pointed out that he was the racist, again.

Now read that a few times, learn, and I am sure it will begin to make ...
11-14-2007 2:02 PM
resumeinfo
This is horrible.. in my opinion. I'm against abortion to a certain extent, of course baby's have the right to life, but so do the mothers, it's a human right!
11-14-2007 2:30 PM
willhelm
Wow, what a read. It is amazing to see the racisim of those like zizzy and righthand so blazingly clear. It is especially funny when it is directed by people from other countries. It shows just how racist most of the world is and illustrates that America is the most non-racist nation on Earth.

Although I generally agree with n2sooner's comment, I would just like to highlight the fact that the ban on abortion in Nicaragua did not cause any of these deaths.
11-14-2007 2:34 PM
ljsdesign
These women would have been saved if the doctors were allowed to perform the necessary surgery, which requires removing the eutopic pregnancy. The ban there on all abortions is what prevented the doctors from saving these women.
11-15-2007 1:38 AM
zizzy
Funny, neither one of you is very good at the game of racist obfuscation, which you so obviously love to play. Perhaps lessons are in order from masters of the game: Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly - take your pick. How about Ward Connerly? I'm sure he'd love to play. Arrivederci.

On abortion and this clip:
A woman's body is not the territory of church, state or community. The decision to terminate or go forward with a pregnancy is her own and requires no intervention or commentary.
11-15-2007 12:57 PM
BitDrifter
Funny, neither one of you is very good at the game of racist obfuscation, which you so obviously love to play. Perhaps lessons are in order from masters of the game: Pat Buchanan, Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly - take your pick. How about Ward Connerly? I'm sure he'd love to play. Arrivederci.
Again, I'm sorry you have a need to defend racists. I do have faith though that as time goes on such racists, and those who defend them such as yourself will fade into obscurity and eventually become extinct.
11-16-2007 12:33 AM
righthand
"All men are created equal". That is not just Americans. It's all men and women. It is the essence of all rights and duties of Americans. Anyone who believes different is not a republican nor an American! That includes the president.

Racism cuts to the very heart of this. A racist is unpatriotic. A true republican cannot be racist against blacks, Nicaragua, Chinese, Irish, Jew, or Arab, whether American or indigenous. All.

Hitler belied in the master race. Do some/many Americans. They are racists. Their masters are careful not to be caught. Their minions are not, as we have seen. These fascist racists wrap themselves in the flag to disguise their racism. They believe they l...
11-16-2007 3:49 AM
abailart
Just a thought: the notion of 'human rights' contains within it, and this is so often conceded only in passing, the concept of 'human obligations'. What if the emphasis on the first part of the pair were replaced by an emphasis on the second, so that for instance we spoke of the human obligation of the powerful to defend the weak, the voiceless, the invisible? Because, paradoxically, the strident claim for 'rights' is often a thin disguise to remove the need for obligations. Often, of course, as in the case under discussion, there is no clear moral answer to vexed issues, and I would hate to see an individual in each case 'instructed' by some external dogmatic law, or condemned for making wh...
11-18-2007 12:31 AM
BitDrifter
"All men are created equal". That is not just Americans. It's all men and women.
That such a racist as your should utter those words is deplorable to say the least. I do hope one day you will understand those words and exponge the racist thoughts that are so ingrained in you.
11-18-2007 7:55 PM
righthand
They're usually very intellectually weak probably as they despise intellectual reasoning. Why not? Their bully boy tactic usually have worked. So no need of brain power.
Quoting myself.

So so easy. Bitdrifter makes no attempt to use any intellect at all never mind reasoning. Need I say more than candy from a baby. A dumb computer would be capable of producing better quality argument that this one.

Look little one, all the rats have gone, deserted you. Withdraw now and put it down to experience.
11-21-2007 5:22 PM
BitDrifter
Quoting myself.
So so easy. Bitdrifter makes no attempt to use any intellect at all never mind reasoning. Need I say more than candy from a baby. A dumb computer would be capable of producing better quality argument that this one. Look little one, all the rats have gone, deserted you. Withdraw now and put it down to experience.
I am sorry that you are so filled with racist thoughts that you are unable to comprehend the simple logic that shines a very bright light on your racism. But I didn't truly expect you too, you who classifies groups of people as sub-human, you who immediately conjures up racist stereotypes when you are presented with the name of a country.


You...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK