Singularity defender George Dvorsky is spot-on when he calls for the singularity-aware to “frame the issue as a scientific endeavor and pitch the various scenarios as hypotheses” and in that “we need to keep the language within the scientific vernacular”. And that’s exactly what’s NOT happening.

Interesting article at source. tks

I couldn't agree more. Thanks for this wildcat.

<<<Perhaps it will require dropping the singularity term altogether in favor of something like "developmental tipping point" (which would coincide more with ASF President John Smart's thinking), "epochal shift" or the like.>>> A bit late?