Search Options
close
Search the following clips:
All Clips
Everyone's Clips
My Guides
Sign Up
Install
Learn More
Login
Civil Rights Laws Don't Insulate Against 'Innuendo,' Judge Rules
boniface
follow
3
6-27-2009 11:25 PM
142 views
Add a Comment
Login
to Comment. Not a member yet?
Sign up
Today's Top Clips
Interesting faces
The Unusual Reproductive Power of the Anglerfish
Cindy Sheehan was given a ticket for impeding traffic at protest
Stayin' Alive
Glenda Dobbs-Palinstein
Agony as a father has to decide: Do I save my wife or my son?
Strategist given warning from White House: never appear on Fox News
Couric Rips Obama
Baby With Burned Hands Has Legs Mistakenly Amputated
Global Warming Fraud and the Future of Science
visit the
Top Clips page
View the Top Clips from
June 27, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://www.clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/1f76683c-4539-4de1-b347-4d150859da57/16DAE9DD-A74A-4FF4-917A-AD8D2FC27750/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202431829307&Civil_Rights_Laws_Dont_Insulate_Against_Innuendo_Judge_Rules" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202431829307&Civil_Rights_Laws_Dont_Insulate_Against_Innuendo_Judge_Rules" style="font-size: 11px;">www.law.com</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202431829307&Civil_Rights_Laws_Dont_Insulate_Against_Innuendo_Judge_Rules"><P>Ruling there is no constitutional right to be free from "innuendo," a federal judge has dismissed a civil rights suit brought by a police chief who claimed his reputation was damaged when borough officials posted an Internet notice that said he had been suspended.</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202431829307&Civil_Rights_Laws_Dont_Insulate_Against_Innuendo_Judge_Rules"><P> "A truthful statement that damages one's reputation simply does not trigger any constitutional concerns," U.S. District Judge J. Curtis Joyner wrote in his 28-page opinion in <A class="linelink" target="new" href="http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/09D0737P.pdf"><EM>McCarthy v. Darman</EM></A>.</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202431829307&Civil_Rights_Laws_Dont_Insulate_Against_Innuendo_Judge_Rules"><P> Plaintiff Albert McCarthy claimed in the suit that he was defamed because notice of his suspension with pay pending the outcome of an investigation was published on the Internet as part of the minutes from a borough council meeting.</P></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202431829307&Civil_Rights_Laws_Dont_Insulate_Against_Innuendo_Judge_Rules"><P> But Joyner concluded that because the published information about the suspension was true, Albert McCarthy could never satisfy the requirements of the so-called "stigma-plus" test to maintain his procedural due process claim.</P></blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;"> </td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/16DAE9DD-A74A-4FF4-917A-AD8D2FC27750/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>
New from the makers of Clipmarks:
Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
Clipmarks
Home
New Clips
Top Clips
Dashboard
Popular Topics
News
Life
Science
Technology
Entertainment
Get Started
Sign Up
Install Clipping Tool
How Clipping Works
Clip-to-Blog™
ClipSearch
Tools and Resources
FAQ
ClipWeek
Top Clippers
Top Tags
Site Map
About Clipmarks
About Us
Contact
Copyright
Privacy
EULA
OK