I'm sure Iran sees the situation as 'Everyone can have Nuclear Weapons but you- and maybe Syria.' The direct, and real threat of having Nuclear weapons used against them by the biggest arsenal in the world, if they even think of defending themselves. No Nuclear weapons are good, but to be threatened by them because they are between Iraq, and Afghanistan, is cheap. Wasn't Iran one of those countries that provided assistance in Afghanistan, and Iraq? All I can see are the richest men in the world, acting like two-bit hoodlums, screwing for 'Protection' money. Playing a cross between Charades and Russian Roulette. (Or should it be called American Roulette.-The winner not only stays alive, they... Iran has every right to not only nuclear power, but also nuclear weapons (which they have no intention of seeking). Every country has a right to self defense, especially when Israel has nukes. Israel does not abide by the IACA agreements either. Explain to me why some countries can have nukes but others cannot? Iran is NOT threatening to nuke Israel, that is just propaganda. But Israel would nuke Iran in a New York minute, for no reason! There's good logic for you. Mind explaining why, if "Israel would nuke Iran in a New York minute, for no reason!", and they have had nukes for years, maybe decades, they haven't nuked Iran yet? Don't take my word for it, ask the Arab states. They have had no problems with Israel having nukes, but they're scared to death of Iran's nukes and are building up their militaries like crazy right now. Of course, if you were Iranian and you heard that Axis of Evil crap, then saw Iraq, which everybody except (maybe) Bush and Rumsfeld knew had no nukes, get overrun; while North Korea, which has nukes, gets nothing more than a dirty look, in what direction would you go? |
View the Top Clips from October 23, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||
