And here are the three new laws that Woods and Murphy propose:

A human may not deploy a robot without the human-robot work system meeting the highest legal and professional standards of safety and ethics.
A robot must respond to humans as appropriate for their roles.
A robot must be endowed with sufficient situated autonomy to protect its own existence as long as such protection provides smooth transfer of control which does not conflict with the First and Second Laws.

Here are Asimov's original three laws:

A robot may not injure a human being, or through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

What if Skynet becomes self aware someday and there's no John Connors, an overbearing mother and a terminator robot to save the world?

The main role that robots are playing in the the present business world is to eliminate jobs for people who need them. Many say that technology can be used for good or evil. There is widespread elimination of jobs in the industrial sector and no one seems to be interested in stopping this trend.

They can take their robots and put them where the sun don't shine for all I care. If man is obviously not capable of taking care of his fellow man, how can he live in peace with a robot? Don't romance the technology.