Key facts left out of this clip that are in the article:
The fundraiser was not sponsored by the mortgage lender,
“Today’s event was a general fundraiser in a room paid for by our campaign and attended by people from varied backgrounds who are committed to changing the tone of our politics — and rejecting the kind of tactics that the Clinton campaign is now embracing. Any suggestion that this was a fundraiser hosted by the mortgage industry is laughable,”
Obama leans heavily on his refusal to accept money from federally registered lobbyists to lend credibility to his assertion that he can resist pressure from vested financial powers that be. It also make...
Key facts left out of this clip that are in the article:
The fundraiser was not sponsored by the mortgage lender,
“Today’s event was a general fundraiser in a room paid for by our campaign and attended by people from varied backgrounds who are committed to changing the tone of our politics — and rejecting the kind of tactics that the Clinton campaign is now embracing. Any suggestion that this was a fundraiser hosted by the mortgage industry is laughable,”
Obama leans heavily on his refusal to accept money from federally registered lobbyists to lend credibility to his assertion that he can resist pressure from vested financial powers that be. It also makes it easier for him to lash out at Washington on the campaign trail, despite his position as a sitting senator.
So really the only thing in this article that has anything to do with Credit Suisse is they rented a room to the Obama campaign. Talk about a misleading clip.