Clipmarks
blueridgefollowshare
7-4-2008 11:20 PM273 views
blueridge says:
BBC "Conspiracy Files" says National Institute of Standards and Technology has "solved" the reason for Bldg 3 mystery "collapse" (ed. perfect crimping and symmetrical demolition from floor up at about the speed of gravity). They will officially lie now and BBC is trying to persuade the public just as George Orwell warned about the Ministry of Truth.

Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (a very formidable group of accredited engineers in building structures) rebuts the lie saying "it's impossible".
6 Comments   | Add a Comment
7-5-2008 4:48 AM
righthand
Can I test this with you?

I'm quite open to the notion that 9/11 was not as we're told. To be that something else would take a lot of planning. Getting 'building3' so wrong and obviously so doesn't make sense at all from such planning. So can they be at the same time both very clever and very stupid?
7-5-2008 7:08 AM
carrerinyes
The mind boggles...
7-5-2008 7:28 AM
BartendingBear
Yes, righthand, they can. Power-drunken arrogance is a horrible thing.
7-5-2008 2:25 PM
blueridge
Right hand, recommend the link to the Architects and Engineers above. Your conclusion of what happened on 9/11 must be based upon not allegation, but hard evidence.

9/11 was a highly planned and technologically advanced attack that could NOT have been done by "hijackers" with no jumbo jet flight experience, and that was done under the cover of war games planned for the very same day. The fact that this event took place precisely on the day of major NORAD and FEMA war games and disaster drills demonstrates at minimum inside knowledge of some kind in timing. The most advanced airline pilots (like John Lear of LearJet, see Pilots for 9/11 Truth) says it would be impossible to hit both WTC t...
7-5-2008 2:56 PM
blueridge
Listen to interview of John Lear (of Lear Jet) about 9/11, particularly starting at the 7:00:00 min mark about the impossibility of hijackers to hit the towers on the first try.

These professionals claim that they could not, so how could rag-tag simulator trained hijackers do it?

Only remote controlled or laser guided technology (as used in cruise missiles or military UAVs like Global Hawk) could have guaranteed two hits. I just happens that one of the key Neoconservative Zionists and member of the PNAC, Dov Zakheim, who was also Pentagon comptrolle...
7-5-2008 4:36 PM
BartendingBear
The members list of Pilots For 9/11 Truth should make any skeptic question the government's story. Pilots are a breed apart, sort of like firemen. They know their stuff cold as their lives and many others depend upon it every single time they fly. When you have dozens of men of decades of flying experience denouncing the official story, it is impossible to ignore their expertise.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK