enbar says: The Asia Times Online on the possiblity that a tacitly US-backed coup d'etat may be the next step in a devastated Iraq, and that control of the country may be returned to a Saddam-like Sunni strongman -- though this is unlikely to provide much stability either. Note that Bush and his people haven't mentioned "spreading democracy" as one of the goals for Iraq since late summer. I blogged this story quoting Joshua Holland's article at Alter.Net on saturday. Still unconfirmed rumours but if there's smoke around, usually it means there's something burning. We should just leave @skwirlinator - ok, so we leave. Then what? Iran is already pushing things far enough - that'll totally leave them to do as they please. North Korea was a perfect example of how they got some oomph with the test (the Iranians did)... until we saw that Bush was right after all on the N. Korea approach. The silly Clinton/Carter approach was a fiasco that didn't accomplish anything using a bilateral approach. Bush insisted on multilateral one and he was right - China pushed a button, started erecting a fence and kim-the-idiot couldn't apologize to them fast enough and promise that he won't do it again, like some spoiled 4-year old. Obviously a setback not only for N. Koreans in their effo... |
View the Top Clips from October 23, 2006
|
|
|
|