Funny, isn’t it, how we can have an administration that destroys our economic infrastructure and violates the Constitution and escapes punishment and accountability; yet, a woman who had oral sex with her boyfriend stands to lose everything because of a few moments of mutually consensual pleasure.

She was 17; he was 16. Give her a break.

WTF, Just don't make any sense.

Thanks for the clip SM.

I've clipped similar stories in the past and gotten hardly a pop.

The fervor for slaying sex offenders is so strong that people won't even dare defend kids who've fallen victim to overzealous prosecuting attorneys and outmoded laws. That irrational sex laws are still on the books is no surprise. That lawyers, judges, and legislatures defend them makes me question the sanity of modern jurisprudence.

One more thought on the subject:

Prosecuting attorneys who place ten year olds and teenagers on a sex offender registry for trivial and antiquated statutory offenses are nothing short of malevolent. While many insist upon the incorrigible pathology of some sex offenders it should be noted that many of our sex laws are also rooted in pathology. The recent trend of prosecuting teenagers who cell phone explicit pictures of the themselves is a case in point. Prosecutors assume serious offenses where their are none except by some antiquated legal mind set. The law's net is cast too broadly in this witch hunt for sex offenders with politicians, the media, and sexual neurotics leading the way. The law is, as always, an ass.

This, while serious sex offenders run free

@laster get the fuck off the internet you spammy son of a bitch.

It is really beyond my comprehension...

The judge should be disbarred and sent to State Prison gen pop. Then he can learn what sexual abuse really looks... and feels like.