… But to argue, as it is done by many contemporary environmentalists, that these questions have already been answered with a consensual yes and that there is an unchallenged scientific consensus about this, is unjustified. And not only unjustified, it is also morally and intellec itual deceptive, and this is bureaucrasomething that I can’t live with.

Like their predecessors [Communist ideologues], they will be certain that they have the right to sacrifice man and his freedom to make their idea reality.

In the past, it was in the nature of the masses or of the proletariat, this time in the name of the planet. Structurally, it is very similar. The current danger, as I see it, is environmentalism, and especially its strongest version, climate alarmism...
[in the hands of its of national, and more often international institutions, who try to maximize their budgets and years of careers as well, regardless of the cost, truth and rationality.]