Clipmarks
merriefollowshare
10-8-2009 4:12 PM
173 views
merrie says:
. . . and offers the only internally consistent explanation for their historic obsession with divisive policy. From their early support of Hitler to their central role in the current financial crisis, the Left’s contribution to domestic and foreign policy at federal, state and local levels can only be described as wantonly destructive. Their takeover of schools and popular culture has been equally toxic. Their environmental radicalism has spawned the energy crisis, while offering no viable alternatives. It defies logic.

But there is logic, a deadly logic, and in the '60’s, two radicals gave it a name: the Cloward-Piven Strategy. As explained in the prior article in this series, the goal was to create a groundswell of demands for public services to overwhelm government, create crisis and usher in a widespread call for fundamental economic reform at the federal level, with socialism the ultimate goal.

Cloward and Piven focused on welfare, voting,
3 Comments   | Add a Comment
10-8-2009 4:15 PM
merrie
. . housing and immigration “rights,” but leftist positions on any issue, whether championing equal “rights,” abortion “rights,” education “rights,” rights to health care, housing, legal protections of antisocial or even criminal behavior, to the point of absurdity, are intentionally divisive. They add new fiscal and regulatory burdens on government, and set new precedents that undermine the limited government concepts embedded in our Constitution, while conferring discriminatory special benefits on legally defined groups the rest of us are forced to pay for.

They deliberately put our society at war with itself. And as Cloward and Piven made clear, the true purpose is not even to help those...
10-8-2009 9:46 PM
JackieDel
I know what you mean...those poor Cubans. Imagine having to put up with a lower infant mortality rate than in the US, and their government spends a greater percentage of their GDP on education (which explains their higher literacy rate than the US). Shocking really. Cubans were far better off under Batista without socialism. They were poverty stricken and living lives of desperation but at least they could strive to be like the minority of elitists who held most of the wealth. Yep, socialism sure is evil.
10-8-2009 10:56 PM
merrie
Yep, socialism sure is evil.

Cuba is a veritable oasis of prosperity.

The government continues to balance the need for economic loosening against a desire for firm political control. It has rolled back limited reforms undertaken in the 1990s to increase enterprise efficiency and alleviate serious shortages of food, consumer goods, and services. The average Cuban's standard of living remains at a lower level than before the downturn of the 1990s, which was caused by the loss of Soviet aid and domestic inefficiencies. Since late 2000, Venezuela has been providing oil on preferential terms, and it currently supplies about 100,000 barrels per day of petroleum products. C...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK