Halkirk opposition to Spittal Hill wind farm


	Halkirk opposition to Spittal Hill wind farm

CohoctonWindWatch

6-23-2007 8:00 AM

314 views

tags:

alternative energy, environment, health hazard, wind laws, wind turbines

CohoctonWindWatch says:

http://www.windaction.org/news/10314

Add a Comment

Login to Comment. Not a member yet? Sign up

Today's Top Clips

visit the Top Clips page

View the Top Clips from June 23, 2007

Embed This Clip In Your Site...

<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://www.clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/1c6953ca-702c-40e9-8c94-03ec550a0324/451FC7B9-97BD-454B-AA12-0DDA007FD70B/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://www.windaction.org/news/10314" href="http://www.windaction.org/news/10314" style="font-size: 11px;">www.windaction.org</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://www.windaction.org/news/10314"><EM>Members of Halkirk District Community Council have voted against the 
proposed wind farm at Spittal Hill and agreed that a leaflet should be prepared 
setting out some of the issues surrounding the £83 million venture. The 
30-turbine scheme planned by Spittal Hill Windfarm Ltd, a company set up by 
brothers Tom and Steven Pottinger, was discussed at the community council's 
latest meeting. It was agreed by 4-2 that a letter should be sent to the 
Scottish Executive opposing the application on the grounds of close proximity to 
inhabited residences; potential noise problems; and cumulative effect. </EM></blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/451FC7B9-97BD-454B-AA12-0DDA007FD70B/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content9.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>

Clipmarks: Home; New Clips; Top Clips; Dashboard

Popular Topics: News; Life; Science; Technology; Entertainment

Get Started: Sign Up; Install Clipping Tool; How Clipping Works; Clip-to-Blog™; ClipSearch

Tools and Resources: FAQ; ClipWeek; Top Clippers; Top Tags; Site Map

About Clipmarks: About Us; Contact; Blog; Copyright; Privacy; EULA

Search Options

Today's Top Clips