From the article:

Ultimately, however, these military gains must be cemented with regional and global diplomacy, political reconciliation, and economic recovery -- tools yet sufficiently utilized. Today's tactical gains in Iraq -- while a necessary pre-condition for political reconciliation -- will crumble without a deliberate and comprehensive strategy.

That means get rid of Bush and the Neocons. Regional and Global Diplomacy sure isn't going to happen under them.

From the article:

Iraq cannot become a staging ground for Islamic extremism or be dominated by other powers in the region, such as Iran and Syria.

It would be dominated by Iran and Syria because w...

From the article:

Ultimately, however, these military gains must be cemented with regional and global diplomacy, political reconciliation, and economic recovery -- tools yet sufficiently utilized. Today's tactical gains in Iraq -- while a necessary pre-condition for political reconciliation -- will crumble without a deliberate and comprehensive strategy.

That means get rid of Bush and the Neocons. Regional and Global Diplomacy sure isn't going to happen under them.

From the article:

Iraq cannot become a staging ground for Islamic extremism or be dominated by other powers in the region, such as Iran and Syria.

It would be dominated by Iran and Syria because we created a power vacuum without any plan for post invasion. Thus we have to fix what we broke with our stupid preemptive strike based on lies.

More from the article:

Fifth, our military capabilities need to match our national strategy. Our military is stretched thin and will be hard-pressed to maintain its current cycle of deployments. At this critical juncture, we cannot afford to be weak. Numbers and capacity matter.

They don't even suggest how to approach that. This all sounds to me like "we'll were stuck here because we don't have a better plan". Bravo.