Clipmarks
martron3000followshare
3-24-2008 1:21 PM1560 views
If Obama is responsible for things his pastor said, are the Clintons responsible for what their pastor did?
37 Comments   | Add a Comment
3-24-2008 1:48 PM
willhelm
Obama is not responsible for what his pastor said. Obama is responsible for being an adherent of Black Liberation Theology and involving himself in this racism and hate for over 20 years. Obama's actions speak directly to his value system and beliefs.

To equate the two circumstances in this clip is point of complete and abject lunacy for partisanship. Dems are funny fools.
3-24-2008 2:09 PM
ratilfar
You got any proof of that Willie, do you know what Black Liberation Theology is?
3-24-2008 2:11 PM
n2sooners
The proof is in Wright's preaching and the church's doctrine.
3-24-2008 2:20 PM
ratilfar
Ok then...lets see the 10 points of the faith as expressed on the Trinity Church own webpage:

# A congregation committed to ADORATION.
# A congregation preaching SALVATION.
# A congregation actively seeking RECONCILIATION.
# A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.
# A congregation committed to BIBLICAL EDUCATION.
# A congregation committed to CULTURAL EDUCATION.
# A congregation committed to the HISTORICAL EDUCATION OF AFRICAN PEOPLE IN DIASPORA.
# A congregation committed to LIBERATION.
# A congregation committed to RESTORATION.
# A congreg...
3-24-2008 2:24 PM
ratilfar
But I know your going to focus on what it says above...

We are a congregation which is Unashamedly Black and Unapologetically Christian... Our roots in the Black religious experience and tradition are deep, lasting and permanent. We are an African people, and remain "true to our native land," the mother continent, the cradle of civilization. God has superintended our pilgrimage through the days of slavery, the days of segregation, and the long night of racism. It is God who gives us the strength and courage to continuously address injustice as a people, and as a congregation. We constantly affirm our trust in God through cultural expression of a Black worship service and minis...
3-24-2008 2:26 PM
ratilfar
From the Wiki (yes, I know its a Wiki):

Black theology is theology from the perspective of the African diaspora - any people or ethnic population forced or induced to leave their traditional homelands. The message of black theology is that the African American struggle for liberation is consistent with the gospel--every theological statement must be consistent with, and perpetuate, the goals of liberation. This theology maintains that African Americans must be liberated from multiple forms of bondage—social, political, economic and religious. This liberation involves empowerment and seeks the right of self-definition, self-affirmation and self-determination.
Again, not trying...
3-24-2008 2:30 PM
ratilfar
And from the Trinity Church Website Mission Statement:

Trinity United Church of Christ has been called by God to be a congregation that is not ashamed of the gospel of Jesus Christ and that does not apologize for its African roots! As a congregation of baptized believers, we are called to be agents of liberation not only for the oppressed, but for all of God’s family. We, as a church family, acknowledge, that we will, building on this affirmation of "who we are" and "whose we are," call men, women, boys and girls to the liberating love of Jesus Christ, inviting them to become a part of the church universal, responding to Jesus’ command that we go into all the world and make disciples...
3-24-2008 2:34 PM
ratilfar
And interesting article on "Black Theology". Will keep on searching...I can not be satisfied with a simple web search, I must dig deeper....
3-24-2008 2:36 PM
ratilfar
And yet another illuminating article from Christianity Today, I'm sure these folks know what their talking about. right? But alas, I must continue my search....
3-24-2008 2:59 PM
willhelm
For example, martron3000, the equivalent case would be if Clinton actually agreed with pedophilia for the purposes of some religious doctrine. If pedophilia was a point of her faith, then she gave a speech suggesting that "some" just do not understand, then she would have a problem.
3-24-2008 3:02 PM
ratilfar
Pedophilia? WTF? Talk about misleading and insulting all at the same time!

New record low for you Willie boy!
3-24-2008 3:51 PM
bignosemousie
Pedophilia? WTF?
Ratilfar, is the following not pedophilia? Now I'm confused.


the former Clinton pastor was sentenced Friday to three years in prison for inappropriately touching a 7-year-old girl at his home last March,
3-24-2008 3:56 PM
ratilfar
Oh it is, but Willie's sentence is misleading, comparing this pastor actions to Wrights and Obama's speech to whatever response the Hillary would give. As if some how Obama did not condemned Wrights words and did not put them in the proper context. Of course not understanding what he is talking about is par for the course.
3-24-2008 11:37 PM
n2sooners
Still shilling for Obama? These examples are not comparable. And Willhelm is right, unless the Clintons knew about it and thought it was okay, then there is no comparison. Even then there really wouldn't be a completely valid comparison since Obama was only covering up his America hating, white blaming, racist preacher while the Clintons would have been covering up a child molesting criminal.

But unless someone can prove the Clintons knew something, then they have nothing to apologize for. And if someone manages to prove Obama knew nothing about his pastor's anti-American, racist tendencies, then it only proves the man is way to stupid to be president. So either way he is screwed.
3-24-2008 11:47 PM
ratilfar
America hating, white blaming, racist preacher
Problem is, as far as I seen, that is not the case. I'm still researching, but nothing seems to support that, except and angry retort in a single video clip, which by the way, most of what is said there is true anyway (except for the AIDS thing, something ugly did happen in Tuskegee, but it was not AIDS) and the "God Damn America" thing, which is indefensible, I don't blame anybody for getting ticked off about that, even if I understand why he said it. But thats not different that blaming gays for the destruction of New Orleans or similar statements made by other Evangelical preachers.
3-24-2008 11:49 PM
ratilfar
The eight men who are survivors of the syphilis study at Tuskegee are a living link to a time not so very long ago that many Americans would prefer not to remember, but we dare not forget. It was a time when our nation failed to live up to its ideals, when our nation broke the trust with our people that is the very foundation of our democracy. It is not only in remembering that shameful past that we can make amends and repair our nation, but it is in remembering that past that we can build a better present and a better future. And without remembering it, we cannot make amends and we cannot go forward.

So today America does remember the hundreds of men used in research ...
3-24-2008 11:51 PM
n2sooners
You leave out the US of KKKA comment. You also ignore him saying the government knew about Pearl Harbor in advance. You seem to have missed a lot of his comments, and I am betting that not every crazy comment he has made is available either.
3-25-2008 12:03 AM
ratilfar
A lot of conservatives believe that Roosevelt knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor in advance. Thats an old conspiracy theory. Like I said before, people make statements but don't back them up. I put up both links and statements.

And thats a lot of Ks. Besides, Obama has written two books on, which he claims have been inspired by his time at Trinity. I'm sure that a lot of political agents have gone through those books with a fine tooth comb, so where is this influence? His speeches in Congress or the Illinois Legislature? I mean if its so pervasive in his character, it simply can't be hidden, now can it?

Has anyone found up a video with Obama in it, while Wright spewed these things? I like to see that one.
3-25-2008 12:12 AM
n2sooners
So, you are coming down on the side that Obama was too dense to know what was going on at his own church?
3-25-2008 12:22 AM
willhelm
Oh it is, but Willie's sentence is misleading, comparing this pastor
actions to Wrights and Obama's speech to whatever response the Hillary
would give. As if some how Obama did not condemned Wrights words and
did not put them in the proper context. Of course not understanding
what he is talking about is par for the course.
I tend not to make comments in response to ratilfar's brink of utter mental retardation, but I feel I must to realign the intent of the clip and original question posed.

For the record, the orignal question assumes a similarity where none exists. My comment was not a comparison, but a distinction. A concept I know is foreign to the unappraochable stu...
3-25-2008 12:24 AM
n2sooners
Seems he must never attend church, and he must not read the newsletter either. Just last year in the pastor's section of the newsletter and article was posted claiming Israel was working with South Africa to create and ethnic bomb that would wipe out only blacks and Arabs.
3-25-2008 12:25 AM
ratilfar
Not at all. I'm coming on the side that Obama did what he needed to do and spoke well. And as I continue my research I find that Wright is more right than wrong. Nothing I heard (except the examples above) is incorrect historically and it is not racist, it is the truth. These two clips are clear examples of it. I do not agree with the words "God Damn America" I don't want any country to be damned, but if you see the whole thing, it makes sense, crude, but makes sense:

Links like these (9:57 min):

http://youtube.com/watch?v=QOdlnzkeoyQ

(6:48 min)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=RvMbeVQj6Lw&feature=related

This one is the clincher, where he compares Hillary experiences with Obamas. And you kno...
3-25-2008 12:28 AM
ratilfar
Now, he is exaggerating when he says Jesus is black, he was neither black nor white, he was a Jew of clear Semitic origin. But I believe that his point is more complicated than that. That as Jesus was oppressed then, African-Americans are oppressed today (or in the resent past).

As for the C- student in the WH, that one happens to be true.
3-25-2008 12:38 AM
willhelm
Given my last comment and the intent on some to go down the road of complete self delusion it seems this thread has run it's course and is of little use to anyone other than to further their own delusion.

Anyway, martron3000, I hope you can see the distinction.
3-25-2008 12:42 AM
ratilfar
Given that you live in a world free of facts Willie, I am not surprised by this.

My apologies to matron3000 for hijacking this thread.

I do get passionate about these things.
3-25-2008 1:02 AM
ratilfar
You never seen a Black Jesus have you? I have, they are part of my culture, so its the White Jesus. Jesus was not that long haired blue eyed symbol most churches publish, now is it?

Jesus was a Jew, that is fact, is it not...he was not Black, he was not White as it is defined in American standards. He was, however a member of a subjugated society under the rule of an Empire. That is at the hear of his message. Would I have said it that way. NO.

But I wonder why you find the idea of a Black Jesus so offensive?
3-25-2008 1:04 AM
willhelm
Oh goodness, yance. Do not get him started. You ain't seen nothin' yet.
3-25-2008 1:12 AM
ratilfar
I offered my facts and proof (see the links). If you offer your own, we can debate this. But if you can not, then why bother.

Yance...you don't like Obama. I accept that. I saw it on my own clip. Fine, your a voter, decide who you want to vote for and live with the consequences.

But so far a lot of people have made a lot of wild accusations with ZERO proof. I live in a world where facts matter. If facts matter to you we can continue this conversation, if not well so be it.
3-25-2008 1:18 AM
ratilfar
In fact, if you want to know where I stand on this, you can see my clip here.

Bring your fire and brimstone if you want Yance, but don't forget the facts.
3-25-2008 12:02 PM
martron3000
Wow! Didn't think my little clip would generate so much discussion (although I secretly hoped it would). Discussion is good, and everyone can learn from others' views, particularly if you keep an open mind. I learned a few things from this thread.
First off, Willhelm, I do realize it's not a fair comparison. I'm sure the Clintons were not aware of, nor responsible for, their pastor's actions, which he no doubt did in secret.
But I also don't think what Rev. Wright has said necessarily reflects the views of Obama either. I'm a white man and have seen video clips of Wright and read some of his views, and frankly I'm not a bit offended by them. His statements don't sound particularly ra...
3-25-2008 12:14 PM
willhelm
But I also don't think what Rev. Wright has said necessarily reflects
the views of Obama either. I'm a white man and have seen video clips of
Wright and read some of his views, and frankly I'm not a bit offended
by them.
Well, you can certainly choose to believe what you want to believe. However, the point about Wright's comments are that they are based on Black Liberation Theology which teaches the destruction of the "white enemy" and believes that God rejects all other races except Blacks. Obama is culpable in his involvement wiht that theology for 20 plus years. That is why it matters. You say discussion is good if you keep an open mind. That is true. However, Are you look...
3-25-2008 12:20 PM
willhelm
That said, martron, I am not convinced that McCain is not a Neocon and I am equally disgusted by them because they are part of that same Progressive wave. So, in that sense I share your disillusionment.
3-25-2008 3:40 PM
ratilfar
The Jews where not....


Ok....ummn...you know...I mean did you ever hear about the multiple rebellions...about who got crucified....

Never mind....

I'll like to meet your history teacher(s) Yance, all of them, so I can smack them upside the head. They did you no favors.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK