Oh, here we go again - it's just like the Intelligent Design argument... if it is science, then it should be taught in the Science, Technology and Society course. When it is not, like ID, or unscientific denialist stuff - then it should be taught in the Religion and Society course - if they are that hard up for syllabus.

...it is intellectually honest to only show the alarmist viewpoint

As a result of the teaching, most students consider that any other than the man-made global warming viewpoint is dishonest.