 gingembre says: "In the same programme there was also a urologist from Mikkeli, who was admirably honest in describing how impotence drugs are prescribed. He says that his youngest patients have been 16 and 17 years old...nothing wrong with the boys, but lack of experience and uncertainty might cause temporary inability to perform. The doctor says that prescribing the medicine for a young person was acceptable, because with its help, the boys were able to get their sex lives going without having to worry about confronting an embarrassing situation. [adding] that the medicine could be dropped later, when confidence with the partner had reached the stage at which performance pressure would not be a problem. There it is, the core of what is now accepted as a sex life. Men need to be capable, and durable. Who cares if there is any emotion involved, to say nothing of trust and a sense of partnership. There’s plenty of time for that later, once the technical performance is made flawle Love your comment Gingembre.. Thanks, I love it, too, but can't take credit for it. It is part of the article. Unfortunately it was cut off, so I'll finish it here and add a little more. There it is, the core of what is now accepted as a sex life. Men need to be capable, and durable. Who cares if there is any emotion involved, to say nothing of trust and a sense of partnership. There’s plenty of time for that later, once the technical performance is made flawless. I don’t envy those who are bringing up children at home or in schools, when a doctor, who is interviewed as an expert, testifies on television that trust has no meaning in beginning a sexual relationship. Talk about how sex is one o... The partners of the women who fought against sexual objectification 35 years ago are now at the age when they would be the best target group of the marketing of impotence medicines. However, for the pharmaceutical industry this was not enough: the sons of these couples have been made targets for marketing with the help of doctors.At first I just was really pleased to find this well-written article on the marketing of impotence drugs, but upon reading it I was horrified to learn that it is far worse than I thought. Is it worth ruining the pleasure of sex, for both sexes, in order to further enrich the pharmaceutical companies and medical doctors who go along with such marketing tactics? Sounds like we Finns have found more desparate ways to lower our apathy caused by the long dark winters  ...seriously it's horrible to see how personal pleasure goes to ahead of health and human relationships in a way like this. How idiot can doctor be if he gives those medicines to 16 year old boys. Mayby the lack of their sexual ability is a sign they should grow up still couple years for things like that. "How idiot can doctor be if he gives those medicines to 16 year old boys. Mayby the lack of their sexual ability is a sign they should grow up still couple years for things like that." Well said. The big pharma companies are towing the doctors by their noses. and making money left and right. And not too mention that 16 yr old boys are surely not in need of those pills. Many people in many age groups are not, they are just told they are. |
View the Top Clips from December 5, 2006
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||
