merrie says: The population can also be a source of strength and intelligence and provide resistance to the insurgency. Alternatively, they can often change sides and provide tacit or real support to the insurgents. Communities make deliberate choices to resist, support or allow insurgent influence. The reasons for these choices must be better understood." The report addresses corruption and abuse of power but it does not give it the primary weightage it should. Karzai and his lot should not remain in power even a day. Abdullah would probably be worse. In the eight years since the Taliban were deposed in November 2001, "criminality has contributed to a pervasive sense of insecurity among the people. Extensive smuggling diverts major revenues from the government and increases its susceptibility to insurgent penetration. http://www.thenews.com.pk/editorial_detail.asp?id=201008 A number of government officials are reportedly complicit in these activities at all levels, further undermining the government’s credibility. The most significant aspect of the production and sale of opium and other narcotics has a corrosive and destabilising impact on corruption within the government. Narcotics activity also funds insurgent groups. This crisis of confidence, coupled with a distinct lack of economic and educational opportunity, has created fertile ground for the insurgency. The Quetta Shura Taliban’s establishment of ombudsmen to investigate abuse of power in its own cadres and remove those found guilty capitalises on this government weakness and attracts popular support ... McChrystal (and the US) fail to really understand the extent to which Indian presence has alienated the Pashtuns in Afghanistan and Pakistan. [...] Despite our best efforts, the insurgents currently have the initiative”. McChrystal admits that the current Afghan government is perceived by Islamabad as pro-Indian: “their activities largely benefit the Afghan people but increasing Indian influence in Afghanistan is likely to exacerbate regional tensions and encourage Pakistani countermeasures in Afghanistan or India.” Pakistan must be made strong economically, targetting FATA especially. The US must not continue to keep Pakistan “afloat only” and fiddle with the Indian card in continuation wi... |
View the Top Clips from October 3, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||
|
|
|||
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|||