Look at how the media covers this story below on "Rice Subpoenaed"". Journalism 101 says you headline the main subject, not the peripheral subjects. Let's cut through the double talk on this article that treats Israel, AIPAC and Jewish agents with kid gloves. Headline should read: "AIPAC Charged With Spying -- Rice and Neocons Subpoenaed". Now that would sell newspapers! Now the article goes on to say (listen to this), the lobbyist received information from a "now convicted Pentagon official and passed it on..." (why not name him?). That would be Larry Franklin, no? This article is designed to save AIPAC's arse from a Second round of public humiliation. Look at the special treatment of the "news" for AIPAC! You have to look so close to see the real story here. Notice that two major neocons--Armitage and Wolfowitz are not mentioned in headline either, just Rice. (AIPAC is certain that the neocons will lie for them).

For security reasons, these people will not be able to testify, give evidence, answer questions, tell them the name of their childrens' pet rabbits or have worm farms.

See my comments under my other clip "U.S. Bombed Syria, Not Israel", to see what I think is going on. Israel does not like their agents charged or tried, and that story was timed suspiciously to bring trouble down on the Bush administration, something very unusual for neocon-friendly Israel to do unless they had a motive--i.e. retaliation for trying 2 AIPAC agents for spying?