 AcesLucky says: Never forget -- the truth. Aces, are you saying you believe that 911 was staged? Oort, in answer to your question you may find this of interest. Or, perhaps, this one. It isn't about conclusions, but rather questions which don't jibe with official answers offered which in the cold light of day remain in the face of the answers. This makes me sad. I don't believe any of those men were cackling with glee at the death of all those people in the Towers. I might be too sensitive still about this event. Have you ever wondered why so much about 9/11 needed to be covered up or not addressed at all? See BartendingBear's answer. And take his advice. You've given a lot of information to go through and I plan to go through it all. So far every time has made a claim of conspiracy and I've looked into it I've yet to find anything that reasonably supported the conspiracy claims. I'm siding on a plain and simple terrorist attack at the moment, however there have been a few things that raised questions so on this particular issue I am quite open minded to new information. I have watched the first video about the south Tower going down and quite frankly the commentary doesn't make its case. He talks about the floors collapsing one after another and the ejection of material happening behind each new floor collapsing. I think there is a misunder... Here is an excellent video resource list for you, Oort, and all others who want to consider the questions, not throwing them out because of the supposed conclusions. It's about questions which remain. One of the biggest of those questions, of course, is why did Building 7 fall when it was never struck by a plane? As well, why did if fall with the totality of its desctruction equal to that of controlled blast triggered building? One of the biggest of those questions, of course, is why did Building 7 fall when it was never struck by a plane? As well, why did if fall with the totality of its desctruction equal to that of controlled blast triggered building?That was the first one I was going to bring up since it was ignored by the th 911 commission completely. But there's also the Pentagon plane that disintegrated completely. There's actually a long, long list of things that "can't" happen but supposedly did. Ok guys, I've gone through alot of stuff, some of it I've seen before, some of it new, and quite frankly I'm not seeing anything that proves a 9-11 conspiracy. I'm not going to insult you guys and try and prove you wrong or anything - one aspect of a conspiracy is not getting caught or discovered, that's what makes a good conspiracy. The arguments about the buildings structural integrity and sheer forces and such - those are well beyond my technical understanding. "Missles" hitting the pentagon? I can't say I wasn't there and there appears to be no visual records and only eye witness accounts. However, the claims of the conspirators simply don't make sense to me. Google building demoliti... On the "pentagon missle" I meant to say "no visual records and only eye witness accounts claiming a missle and claiming a jet." In other words, its a choice on what you want to believe. I have to go with no conspiracy because there are photos that show plane debri and the explanation for the small hole is plausable. Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise, just explaining why I think that the entire thing is exactly as it appears - a terrorist attack by foreign enemies. Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise, just explaining why I think that the entire thing is exactly as it appears - a terrorist attack by foreign enemies.That's good enough for me on your part. For me, there are too many things that "can't happen" that did. And far too many coincidences that did happen just right. |
View the Top Clips from April 17, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||
|
|
|||
