These 'coincidences' of 9/11 are new to me. There is more in the article. I do know that the CIA chose the date of the Chilean coup. Did they have a input/choice in the 2001 9/11, too? Now, I wish to high jack my own clip in direction?!

WHO WON 9/11? Stupid question? Like asking who won WW2. Like the Russian in Europe and the Americans in the Pacific would be a good enough answer for then. Fascist, Imperialist, Militarist states were defeated? And now?

FASCISM WON WW2!!! The US and Israel are the leading Fascist Imperialist Militarist States today!!! Gaza today is one giant smokeless death camp!!! In the Middle East, the former prisoners are now the camp guards...

These 'coincidences' of 9/11 are new to me. There is more in the article. I do know that the CIA chose the date of the Chilean coup. Did they have a input/choice in the 2001 9/11, too? Now, I wish to high jack my own clip in direction?!

WHO WON 9/11? Stupid question? Like asking who won WW2. Like the Russian in Europe and the Americans in the Pacific would be a good enough answer for then. Fascist, Imperialist, Militarist states were defeated? And now?

FASCISM WON WW2!!! The US and Israel are the leading Fascist Imperialist Militarist States today!!! Gaza today is one giant smokeless death camp!!! In the Middle East, the former prisoners are now the camp guards. Being worked to death is replaced with boredom and starvation. Torture, isolation and humiliation on a whim. The jailed learnt well. Settlements and occupation take slightly longer. The testing ground for future US settlements, invasions and occupations?

SO WHO WON 9/11? Well was there ever such a one-sided war? How many Al Qaeda (the base) against how many millions against them? And I'm questioning who won? Do you feel that you won or that this 'winning' was worth it? Who set the parameters of this 'war on terror' that didn't ensure an easy win when setting their own rules? Were they arrogant? Were they American?

Should I continue my befuddled drug-induced musings before it's too late? No? Too raw? Martyrs and suicide next.

Sept. 11 and "9/11" is often overlooked as constituting what criminologists call a "signature", a clue of those with a particular agenda in their historic pattern of doing revolutionary things or commission of crimes. 911 is also the number for "emergency", a strong psychological connection for justification of "emergency powers" by Bush administration.

The pattern of derivatives of "11" go back to ancient superstitious behaviors frequently employed today by freemasons who imitate those ancient customs believing that their is "power" derived in numerological powers. In addition to the above, cons...

Sept. 11 and "9/11" is often overlooked as constituting what criminologists call a "signature", a clue of those with a particular agenda in their historic pattern of doing revolutionary things or commission of crimes. 911 is also the number for "emergency", a strong psychological connection for justification of "emergency powers" by Bush administration.

The pattern of derivatives of "11" go back to ancient superstitious behaviors frequently employed today by freemasons who imitate those ancient customs believing that their is "power" derived in numerological powers. In addition to the above, consider:

9/11

11/22--assassination of JFK

9/11--George H. W. Bush speech of "new world order" on begin of Iraq War I, given 9/11/1990, precisely 11 years before 9/11 to the day.

7/7--Britain's "9/11" subway bombing

3/11--The Madrid subway bombing

The many 11's in 9/11: i.e. 11 represents Twin Towers, Flight 11, Flight 77, much more here

Don't forget where America got its first taste of "imperialistic" blood: it grabbed the Philippines on the eve of that country's hard-earned independence. The Filipinos had been fighting the Spaniards for over three hundred years, and just when they were about to be the first colony to wrest its freedom from the colonialist powers (Britain, France, Holland, and of course Spain) along comes neophyte America trying to flex its international muscles. For the Filipinos it was no picnic. If people felt sick about the Mylai massacre in Vietnam, there were hundreds of such villages mainly in Luzon. President MacKinley's reason for grabbing the Philippines? Why, it was the divine destiny of Ameri...

Don't forget where America got its first taste of "imperialistic" blood: it grabbed the Philippines on the eve of that country's hard-earned independence. The Filipinos had been fighting the Spaniards for over three hundred years, and just when they were about to be the first colony to wrest its freedom from the colonialist powers (Britain, France, Holland, and of course Spain) along comes neophyte America trying to flex its international muscles. For the Filipinos it was no picnic. If people felt sick about the Mylai massacre in Vietnam, there were hundreds of such villages mainly in Luzon. President MacKinley's reason for grabbing the Philippines? Why, it was the divine destiny of America to bring christianity and education to the Filipinos. His CIA at the time forgot to tell him that the Philippines was already the first Catholic nation in Asia long before America even existed, and the University of Sto. Thomas in Manila existed more than a century before Harvard. I guess since that first time America never lost its taste for meddling with other nations.

Well, anti-Catholicism was part of the cover-up a hundred years ago, but it wasn't part of the motive for the war. It was the end of America's continental westward expansion, and acting on a phony excuse, the US seized Cuba and then the Philippines as part of the Spanish-American war. Tragically, extermination orders were given by American commanders on some islands, resulting in thousands of deaths.
Americans are largely unaware of this, and it would help us so much to know it. It was yet another case where a zealous President with expansionist dreams made a case that "they will welcome us as liberators," only to find indigenous peoples wanted American domination no more than they did Sp...

Well, anti-Catholicism was part of the cover-up a hundred years ago, but it wasn't part of the motive for the war. It was the end of America's continental westward expansion, and acting on a phony excuse, the US seized Cuba and then the Philippines as part of the Spanish-American war. Tragically, extermination orders were given by American commanders on some islands, resulting in thousands of deaths.
Americans are largely unaware of this, and it would help us so much to know it. It was yet another case where a zealous President with expansionist dreams made a case that "they will welcome us as liberators," only to find indigenous peoples wanted American domination no more than they did Spanish. See A Tale for Every American for Mark Twain's remarkable 1906 comments.

Masbury, thank you for endeavouring to giving me some overview of the Spanish-American War and the Philippines part in it.

When I was a youth. the most common repeated demonstration call was "Go home, Yankee Imperialist Pig." Then it made no sense to me. In the era of our beloved JFK, America could do no wrong. None.

Virtually everything good that I believed to be true about America has now proved to be a lie. Just the other day. I was astonished to learn from CM that the USA did NOT celebrate Christmas Day until relatively recently. And yet on reflection, this makes perfect sense. Jesus Christ turned a religion of HATE and KILLING d...

Masbury, thank you for endeavouring to giving me some overview of the Spanish-American War and the Philippines part in it.

When I was a youth. the most common repeated demonstration call was "Go home, Yankee Imperialist Pig." Then it made no sense to me. In the era of our beloved JFK, America could do no wrong. None.

Virtually everything good that I believed to be true about America has now proved to be a lie. Just the other day. I was astonished to learn from CM that the USA did NOT celebrate Christmas Day until relatively recently. And yet on reflection, this makes perfect sense. Jesus Christ turned a religion of HATE and KILLING dramatically into a religion of LOVE and PEACE. Retribution is the attribute that most defines religion now in America. What has retribution got to do with Christianity?

So why would America honour Jesus Christ's notionally birthday whom they only follow notionally while they snip bits off their males bodies in honour of another faith.

As the glass is more than half full type, it is not without difficulty that I now approach all pronouncement from America politicians as being LIES. Healthy scepticism is now replaced with a mental direct translation into the opposite of stated. Sanity for me is from within the sane, mostly honest ClipMarks community. Excepting gnats like nightboz, who are best ignored.

Sorry right hand- some people ya know?

People like righthand?

"Yes, Christian Zionist are the lowest form of life." - righthand

"As for 'POPPED', do we have to know when he's about in this fashion.
Popping doesn't require a comment from the number one asslicker on
ChipMarks." - righthand

"I suppose when we see the learning capacity of some here on ClipMarks, then it's easier to understand this continuous ineptitude and inability to learn.
I
can see how this blind stupidly may help in believing in a god, but why
apply exactly the same blind conviction in an obvious mistake-ridden
twat." - righthand

" Oh, the stupidity of this question a[b]...

Sorry right hand- some people ya know?

People like righthand?

"Yes, Christian Zionist are the lowest form of life." - righthand

"As for 'POPPED', do we have to know when he's about in this fashion.
Popping doesn't require a comment from the number one asslicker on
ChipMarks." - righthand

"I suppose when we see the learning capacity of some here on ClipMarks, then it's easier to understand this continuous ineptitude and inability to learn.
I
can see how this blind stupidly may help in believing in a god, but why
apply exactly the same blind conviction in an obvious mistake-ridden
twat." - righthand

" Oh, the stupidity of this question and any one who would put it forward as a logical argument." - righthand

Martyrs and suicide ... continued ...

All causes need martyrs. BLOODY SUNDAY proved a turning point in Northern Ireland. At a civil rights march for basic standard human rights, 13 ordinary civilians were murdered by the British Paratroopers, likely on direction from London. Then there was the attempted Widgery whitewash. The IRA could not deal with the number of volunteers. No wrong that they might do could count against the state murdering its citizens particularly in an artificially conjured up fiction state that the Brits were responsible for.

Previously there was the "Ireland unfree shall never be at peace" speech. They were the climactic closing words of the graveside oration of Pat...

Martyrs and suicide ... continued ...

All causes need martyrs. BLOODY SUNDAY proved a turning point in Northern Ireland. At a civil rights march for basic standard human rights, 13 ordinary civilians were murdered by the British Paratroopers, likely on direction from London. Then there was the attempted Widgery whitewash. The IRA could not deal with the number of volunteers. No wrong that they might do could count against the state murdering its citizens particularly in an artificially conjured up fiction state that the Brits were responsible for.

Previously there was the "Ireland unfree shall never be at peace" speech. They were the climactic closing words of the graveside oration of Patrick Pearse at the funeral of Jeremiah O'Donovan Rossa in Aug 1915. The oration roused Irish republican feeling and was a significant element in the lead-up to the Easter Rising of 1916. Rossa body came from New York.

Palestinian children being murdered for firing stones at tanks is another example of the state getting it wrong. Hizbollah is another example of choosing the wrong target and getting it wrong.

The error of declaring war on a non-state was highlighted by the 'War on Drugs'. Given that it was the state that introduced drugs into the black ghettos, it was a bit like declaring war on yourself! No sane person would declare a war that it cannot win. How could you win a war on drugs or on terrorism.

So was it intended that you win the war on terrorism or just have a war on whoever you fancied at that moment. Either way it does not matter. Al-Quaida cannot lose as long as one is free. The USA cannot win.

With the starting point of 9/11 up to now, it is absolutely that the USA is beating itself in the 'War on Terror' with the American citizen being the biggest loser over all. Anyway, you didn't attack Iran, just, yet.