Clipmarks
spherepetfollowshare
2-13-2008 2:20 PM1736 views
7 Comments   | Add a Comment
2-13-2008 2:31 PM
quickstar
I know I will take some flak for this, but I feel bad for the clam... There is something so sadistic (in my humble opinion) that people kill 450 year old clams, 1000 year old trees, and they don't so much as bat an eye.
2-13-2008 7:44 PM
debbyski
POP for Quickstar's comment.
2-14-2008 11:55 AM
Lancebowski
POP.

2-14-2008 12:23 PM
KimbleKency1683
I do agree with you quickstar, but in this instance it seems like it was an accident that the clam died.

"Unfortunately, by the time its true age had been established Ming was already dead. But the scientists aged the 3.4in clam from its shell which like trees has a layer or ring of growth for every year that the animal has been alive."
2-16-2008 4:25 PM
cosmic_kitten1
If it's in the water and it's lived for that long, obviously something was going right. Then people decided "let's take the clam out of the water." How can that be an accident?
Pop for quickstar.
2-16-2008 11:10 PM
KimbleKency1683
"The record-breaking shellfish, 31 years older than the previous oldest animal, another clam, was caught last year when scientists from the Bangor University School of Ocean Sciences were dredging the seabed north of Iceland.

The "Arctica islandica" was among a haul of 3,000 empty shells and 34 live molluscs taken to the laboratory."

2-16-2008 11:12 PM
KimbleKency1683
Animals are captured all the time for scientific study. From reading the article, if they would've known the clam was that old they would've kept it alive. It was an accident that the clam died.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK