 debbyski says: "I've heard people say "The Clinton years were the good years," comparing Bill Clinton's presidency with that of George W. Bush. Nonsense. The 230 years prior to Bush were the good years. Every president before him now looks like a saint. And the damage he is doing is being done with a big assist from Congress. He has over a year left to do it in before any election." So which President was elected promising to keep us out of war only to immediately have half a million American dead in WWI? Or which one was known for his deadly ability to massacre Indians - usually right after concluding some peace treaty with them? How about the ones who owned slaves? Or perhaps the President who made a deal with Southern Democrats that they could treat blacks any way they wanted as long as he got the electoral votes to enter the White House? And let's not forget which occupant was getting blowjobs in the Oval Office and inserting cigars into a woman about the age of his own daughter. The one who would still be denying the truth save for the fact that he ejaculated ... And let's not forget which occupant was getting blowjobs in the Oval Office and inserting cigars into a woman about the age of his own daughter. The one who would still be denying the truth save for the fact that he ejaculated all over her dress.I find it interesting that your moral values seem to be crotch based as opposed to Clinton and NAFTA for example. So having a blowjob in the oval office is worse than invading a country? Ok.... Yes, they have been worse, although Wilson did not enter into WWI until a) there was major outcry by the public in support of the allies and b) several U.S. ships (which where carrying both armaments and civilians) where sunk by German U-Boats, he was also the President who tried to enact the League of Nations but was shot down by the Republicans (so the U.S. never became a member). He also tried to moderate the end of WWI, but the French and the British wanted none of that. Bush is incompetent, immoral and downright stupid. The worse combination of Grant, Jackson, Nixon and Polk. ColoradoRight, Perhaps you should check the source of clips before you comment. This clip was intended for the ignorant, duped, and self-absorbed. Willhelm, if you do not like the fact that I am posting clips with views that you cannot accept, then by all means, don't read the clips. If you can't tolerate someone else having different views and you don't care if others are hurt by your comments then go to the clips that you feel benefit you. If you really feel you have wasted your time reading articles like this and have learned nothing, then please feel free to use your time more constructively on your own clips. What makes you think that I do not accept the views of the ignorant, duped, and self-absorbed? It happens to be one of the main reasons I read Clipmarks. We must know all sides. Debbyski, my intellectual starting point, opinions, and sources are not dependent on one another as they are in your case. I am not threatened in the least by any point of view. Your comments suggest you are. Debbyski, my intellectual starting point, opinions, and sources are not dependent on one another as they are in your caseSigh . . . Well, despite the fact that I doubt you even understand what that means, it is so obviously true. Well, despite the fact that I doubt you even understand what that means, it is so obviously true.Willhelm, have you ever taken a social IQ test? This is a serious question. Even though I can probably guess your score, I would be interested in knowing it. Myers-Briggs: INTJ Debbyski, Did you happen to drop out of school in the 8th grade? Your ability to rationally assess facts and information seems to be lacking. LOL* Willhelm, Your last comment only further justifies my belief that your social IQ is below at a level where help is recommended. Unfortunately, for you, social IQ is hard-wired in the brain. But you could improve, if you tried. Empathy and social skills are two of the main components of social IQ. Try to develop them. BTW, I'm college educated and have worked in the field of social work among other things, so I'm using my professional opinion. That is funny. Your last comment must illustrate the same thing then. If you apply your "professional opinion" to the personality of an on-line conmmenter, then I would say your "professional opinion" is a petty and self-serving display of the opposite that you suggest. And a further example that your intellectual starting point, information, and opinion are all dependent on one another. Again, thanks for the display of stark clarity. |
View the Top Clips from September 24, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
