Clipmarks
wildcatfollowshare
4-8-2008 4:34 AM670 views
wildcat says:
"To a certain extent, memories are societal properties," says Adam Kolber, a visiting professor at Princeton.
"We really need to articulate a moral code that governs all this," warns Arthur Caplan, a University of Pennsylvania bioethicist.
6 Comments   | Add a Comment
4-8-2008 5:44 AM
abailart
The skull wall is not relevant to nodes of memory which is all shared.
4-8-2008 6:52 AM
Silkweaver
Besides the obvious volume and management limitations of our 'wetware' memory, now it seems it is unsecured anymore. It's time to find a secure space to hide our private memories outside our skulls.
4-8-2008 6:54 AM
wildcat
accessible to search engines? indexed? tagged?
4-8-2008 7:00 AM
yanceducat
If you have censorship in a society, eventually the right of government to control the brain will exist; to not only lock you in prison as now is done because one might disagree on a point of PC history, but to lock you up for what you think!

After all, who could argue the reality? If you think that a historian PC approved might have gotten it wrong, there is a real danger you might actually say that aloud!
4-8-2008 5:45 PM
Fucc Copyrights
Must eat brains for information! (Zombie Voice)

4-10-2008 8:54 AM
swampfoxz
Reminds me of the movie "Fortress".
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK