AineMacDermot says: Bush acts as if it's an insult to have his appointed officials testify "under oath" even though they've proven time and time again that their words cannot be trusted. If they can't be trusted to tell the truth while not under oath, they should be compelled to do so under oath in public while being taped, and a transcript of their testimony should be made available. It is the only means of holding liars accountable and responsible for their misleading statements to Congress. If they intend to tell the truth, why is Bush opposed to them testifying while under oath? |
View the Top Clips from March 21, 2007
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||