 debbyski says: "Parsley claims that Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" predicated on "deception." The Muslim prophet Muhammad, he writes, "received revelations from demons and not from the true God. And he emphasizes this point: "Allah was a demon spirit." Parsley does not differentiate between violent Islamic extremists and other followers of the religion" Parsley, who refers to himself as a "Christocrat," is no stranger to controversy. In 2007, the grassroots organization he founded, the Center for Moral Clarity, called for prosecuting people who commit adultery. In January, he compared Planned Parenthood to Nazis. In the past Parsley's church has been accused of engaging in pro-Republican partisan activities in violation of its tax-exempt status." I guess breaking the law is not really immoral. Yance, Although I support Hillary for many reasons, I am of a differing opinion. I feel as though if Hillary gets the nomination then McCain will probably win for the reasons you just stated. There are millions and millions of those type of folks here in America and it would take a Hillary to get them organized and out for the vote. But hell, I could be wrong. I was wrong once before. So we are regressing to a country that wants to enter into religious wars. "Parsley claims that Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" predicated on "deceptionSo what? He advocates that we no longer support religious freedom? The reason the Pilgrims came here in the first place. Methinks if anyone is receiving revelations from demons it's : (multiple choice) A. George Bush B. John McCain C. Rev. Parsley D. All of the above NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll March 7-10, 2008. Asked of Democrats, and non-Democrats who said they would vote or have voted in a Democratic presidential primary (from a total sample of 1,012 registered voters nationwide). "Who do you think would have the better chance of defeating John McCain in the general election in November: Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?" Obama 48% Clinton 38% Other 1% Neither 2% Unsure 11%  You can't even do math. Unsure does not go into any column. More people think Obama has the better chance. Glad to see that you don't support Hillary's claims of winning Florida and Michigan. That's refreshing for once and shows that you are growing. Your quote: I happen to think a real election is different than an imaginary one.Those were not democratically held elections. You can claim they were elections but they were not democratically held ones. She has taken for granted that she was the anointed one. She failed to take seriously states that the Obama campaign has not. Anybody who is that cavalier was never ready. I just don't think they will be able to whip them into such a frenzy as they would with Hillary. As you know Yance, I was wrong once.  What the hell is a spiritual advisor? How can anyone advise anyone else on someone elses spirit? Everyone's is different. I have reservations on someone that even thinks they need a spiritual advisor. I may have been wrong in the past; frankly at the moment I am too tired to remember or care.Get some rest honey. Hey yance, what are the response possibilities that Hillary doesn't have that she should have? I don't believe Hillary is Satan, I just believe she is a candidate who cannot realistically catch the current winning candidate and whose continuance further empowers the party of Karl Rove and George Bush. You know the party that has smeared and knee capped Hillary for the last 20+ years........ the party you plan to vote for in November. Can you even be taken seriously? You mean like you being concerned that Obama would overturn Bush unconstitutional executive orders, yet you have no concern of including delegates from elections where there was no campaign, voters didn't turn out because they were told the results wouldn't count, and other contestants didn't have their names on the ballot. You're laughable. Have fun voting for the the republicans who have smeared Hillary and knee capped her for the last 20+ years. I wonder what your journal entry will look like that night, "My dearest Hillary, I hate Obama so much , I voted for the party who said you had Vince Foster killed. I received such a rush pulling the lever for the party of Karl Rove and Donald Rumsfeld." Hey yance, what are the response possibilities that Hillary doesn't have that she should have? What is a spiritual advisor? Is this an astrology thing? What kind of wacky shit are we expecting from presidential candidates? Perhaps we should review the job requirements because someone that cant govern themselves should not be governing a country. Yance, you had made your decision to vote for Karl Rove, Rush Limbaugh and Donald Rumsfeld before you came on clipmarks. Anyone with such crappy logic as that can't be convinced to act in a logical manner. "Dear Hillary, I am writing to tell you how I honored you today with my vote for the republican party. You remember that time in 2002 when they jammed the phone lines in New Hampshire blocking the Democratic-get-out-the-vote effort disenfranchising thousands of voters. Those were good times weren't they? It makes my heart swell to have voted for John Ashcroft who placed curtains around that disgusting nude female statue of the Spirit of Justice. It's all for you Hillary!" Hey yance, what are the response possibilities that Hillary doesn't have that she should have? She wasn't crucified for mentioning that Lyndon Johnson was a part of the civil rights she was taken to task for diminishing the role of Martin Luther King in the Civil Rights Movement. And why was that even relevant in the campaign? Just thinking about your defense against sexists as you pull that lever for John Ashcroft and the republican party who believes that the woman's body is so vile that you have to cover the Spirit of Justice statue with curtains. Hillary will be so proud of you. No, that apparently LBJ was the main player. That it couldn't have happened without him. Of the two, more integral to the Civil Rights was definitely Dr. Martin Luther King. Once again was the relevance to the campaign for Hillary to even have made this statement? It would be the same if someone had said, "Now women let's not get carried away with the life long struggle of Susan B. Anthony. I mean after all it wouldn't be squat without a man in the White House to enact the legislation." And you make my point, what was the purpose of Hillary Clinton to subjugate anyone in the effort as having to have relied on the other. I have never said that it would be fair to diminish LBJ. I think it is fair to reflect history as most prominent historians see that the events unfolded. How was it that John Edwards, who was still competitive at that point in the campaign felt compelled to say this "I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician." Once again I ask you, what relevance was this to our national campaign that Hillary had to comment the way that she did? I'm discussing Hillary as a human. You are the one stooping to use the "bitch" terminology. Where did I say Barack Obama is Martin Luther King? However, he did turn down the wealth that would have been easily obtainable as a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School to work as an organizer in Chicago. Obama has shown a willingness to work across the isle with republicans when the legislation betters our country like the transparency legislation he and Tom Coburn wrote (by the way, why hasn't Hillary disclosed her earmark appropriations?). Obama has consistently outperformed Hillary in polling against John McCain. He has won contests from Wyoming to South Carolina to Maine attracting ... Uh in your perusing of the dictionary you may want to give some thought to the sentence structure. It is a man (Martin Luther King) being subjugated to another man (Lyndon Baines Johnson). Nice try though. You really are desperate. So now are you now calling John Edwards a sexist. After all he said, "I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician."And if you are a crusader defender of womens rights I can hardly see how it is you are going to willfully vote for the republican party In November. Look at how Tonya Melich, author of "The Republican War Against Women", des... Nope. Said that Hillary minimized MLK's role relative to LBJ's role. Historians see it the other way around. Edwards sees it the other way around, "I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician." Yeah, me and John Edwards and historians, ...... wwwaaayyyy out there. Surely you don't even take yourself seriously. Hey yance, when you vote republican this November, are you going to admit it to the female relatives and friends in your life? Yance, there is a thing called a thesaurus. You should really investigate what one is. I do interchange words that have basically the same meaning. I know that's alarming. Were you talking into a mirror on that last part? I guess John Edwards is a liar? "I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician."Has Hillary been playing the PC BS cry baby playing the victim role for the last 20 years, or is there really a smear campaign against her by the republican party which you plan to vote for this November? Karl Rove wants to know. Wow, the above debate sure did get wayyy of topic What is a spiritual advisor? Is this an astrology thing? What kind of wacky shit are we expecting from presidential candidates? Perhaps we should review the job requirements because someone that cant govern themselves should not be governing a country.I agree skwirl. I think it has more to do with McCain trying to prove he's not a screamin liberal. He had to pick somebody after he lost Hagee. I think the whole race is a joke. For one thing, we only had about 6 people who had a real chance of winning their party's nomination to choose from. Not to mention we're not really voting for individuals anymore, we're voting for political parties and their ideals. Definition of insanity: doing the same thing and expecting the same results. We keep electing the same political parties and expecting different results. *Definition of insanity: doing the same thing and expecting different results sorry for the typo there |
View the Top Clips from March 14, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
