Those were not democratically held elections. You can claim they were elections but they were not democratically held ones.

Anyone that wanted to vote could vote. That is as democratic as it can get.

I know, voters didn't educate themselves or care enough to bother. Boo Hoo as someone might say but too bad because Hillary's voters did do their job.

She has taken for granted that she was the anointed one. She failed to take seriously states that the Obama campaign has not. Anybody who is that cavalier was never ready.

She does not have unlimited funds or time. She did not ignore states because she thought she was the anointed one.
You are just saying things f...

Those were not democratically held elections. You can claim they were elections but they were not democratically held ones.

Anyone that wanted to vote could vote. That is as democratic as it can get.

I know, voters didn't educate themselves or care enough to bother. Boo Hoo as someone might say but too bad because Hillary's voters did do their job.

She has taken for granted that she was the anointed one. She failed to take seriously states that the Obama campaign has not. Anybody who is that cavalier was never ready.

She does not have unlimited funds or time. She did not ignore states because she thought she was the anointed one.
You are just saying things for the sake of saying them.

Repeat, repeat, repeat you will believe your own story, you myth of malignity toward Hillary.

I just don't think they will be able to whip them into such a frenzy as they would with Hillary.

That is certainly the conventional wisdom. It may be correct. Certainly Hillary wins the being hated derby hands down.
I admit that I was really shocked to find out Democrats would do the same thing as the Republicans only they are doing it to one of their own, maybe I mean one of their own I mean, Satan might be who a lot of Democrats think she is. Oh well.

My guess is that Hillary is handicapped with her campaign because of the social norms that Democrats adhere to, limit her response possibilities.
The Republicans won't have a base that is susceptible to being held hostage th...

I just don't think they will be able to whip them into such a frenzy as they would with Hillary.

That is certainly the conventional wisdom. It may be correct. Certainly Hillary wins the being hated derby hands down.
I admit that I was really shocked to find out Democrats would do the same thing as the Republicans only they are doing it to one of their own, maybe I mean one of their own I mean, Satan might be who a lot of Democrats think she is. Oh well.

My guess is that Hillary is handicapped with her campaign because of the social norms that Democrats adhere to, limit her response possibilities.
The Republicans won't have a base that is susceptible to being held hostage that way,
They can take the gloves off without PC influence having much impact on their own base.

I may have been wrong in the past; frankly at the moment I am too tired to remember or care.

You mean like you being concerned that Obama would overturn Bush unconstitutional executive orders, yet you have no concern of including delegates from elections where there was no campaign, voters didn't turn out because they were told the results wouldn't count, and other contestants didn't have their names on the ballot.

You're laughable.

Have fun voting for the the republicans who have smeared Hillary and knee capped her for the last 20+ years. I wonder what your journal entry will look like that night, "My dearest Hillary, I hate Obama so much , I voted for the party who said you had Vince Foster killed. I received such a rush pulling the lever for the party of Karl Rove and Do...

You mean like you being concerned that Obama would overturn Bush unconstitutional executive orders, yet you have no concern of including delegates from elections where there was no campaign, voters didn't turn out because they were told the results wouldn't count, and other contestants didn't have their names on the ballot.

You're laughable.

Have fun voting for the the republicans who have smeared Hillary and knee capped her for the last 20+ years. I wonder what your journal entry will look like that night, "My dearest Hillary, I hate Obama so much , I voted for the party who said you had Vince Foster killed. I received such a rush pulling the lever for the party of Karl Rove and Donald Rumsfeld."

The whole comment just oozes venom.

You think a person would want to vote for a candidate whose supporters are so openly without decency?

No, that apparently LBJ was the main player. That it couldn't have happened without him. Of the two, more integral to the Civil Rights was definitely Dr. Martin Luther King.

So in your world it's OK to diminish Lyndon Johnson and not OK to diminish King. In case you don't know it, Blacks also diminished him while he was alive.

You might also think about Malcolm X, and the Black Panthers. And Rosa Parks. And countless others both Back and White and Brown and Jewish and who knows who, without which King wasn't a mosquito on a raccoons back!

I personally have always given great credit to the Panthers in California who marched into the State Legislature carrying riffles but b...

No, that apparently LBJ was the main player. That it couldn't have happened without him. Of the two, more integral to the Civil Rights was definitely Dr. Martin Luther King.

So in your world it's OK to diminish Lyndon Johnson and not OK to diminish King. In case you don't know it, Blacks also diminished him while he was alive.

You might also think about Malcolm X, and the Black Panthers. And Rosa Parks. And countless others both Back and White and Brown and Jewish and who knows who, without which King wasn't a mosquito on a raccoons back!

I personally have always given great credit to the Panthers in California who marched into the State Legislature carrying riffles but being non violent. To me that was a seminal moment, where you had photos of Blacks with guns, standing up for themselves in a non violent way. That was real. That fixes itself into the mind!

what was the purpose of Hillary Clinton to subjugate anyone in the effort as having to have relied on the other.

It doesn't matter what the purpose was.(and she did not subjugate anyone so stop with the Hillary is a bitch nonsence)

It doesn't change the fact that opportunist cry babies used her truthful statements to play the race card.

And only an idiot would not understand what her point is and only a demigod would abuse the situation the way the Obama campaign did.

And only a fool would think that Obama has anything like the standing of King. King actually did things you know and put his life on the line. Obama has done nothing except get lucky thanks to what others di...

what was the purpose of Hillary Clinton to subjugate anyone in the effort as having to have relied on the other.

It doesn't matter what the purpose was.(and she did not subjugate anyone so stop with the Hillary is a bitch nonsence)

It doesn't change the fact that opportunist cry babies used her truthful statements to play the race card.

And only an idiot would not understand what her point is and only a demigod would abuse the situation the way the Obama campaign did.

And only a fool would think that Obama has anything like the standing of King. King actually did things you know and put his life on the line. Obama has done nothing except get lucky thanks to what others did before and for him.

Obama hasn't proven a single thing except that he can go to school, say things in a safe way, rationalize and make excuses, and make speeches.

I'm discussing Hillary as a human. You are the one stooping to use the "bitch" terminology.

Where did I say Barack Obama is Martin Luther King?

However, he did turn down the wealth that would have been easily obtainable as a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School to work as an organizer in Chicago. Obama has shown a willingness to work across the isle with republicans when the legislation betters our country like the transparency legislation he and Tom Coburn wrote (by the way, why hasn't Hillary disclosed her earmark appropriations?).

Obama has consistently outperformed Hillary in polling against John McCain. He has won contests from Wyoming to South Carolina to Maine attracting ...

I'm discussing Hillary as a human. You are the one stooping to use the "bitch" terminology.

Where did I say Barack Obama is Martin Luther King?

However, he did turn down the wealth that would have been easily obtainable as a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School to work as an organizer in Chicago. Obama has shown a willingness to work across the isle with republicans when the legislation betters our country like the transparency legislation he and Tom Coburn wrote (by the way, why hasn't Hillary disclosed her earmark appropriations?).

Obama has consistently outperformed Hillary in polling against John McCain. He has won contests from Wyoming to South Carolina to Maine attracting all walks of life and the crucial independent vote. He has attracted more delegates, more popular vote, and raised more cash than Hillary.

I think John Edwards had it correct, ""I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician."

And I think that's why John Edwards delegates from the Iowa caucuses went to Obama and not Hillary. +9 delegates this week putting Hillary even further behind.

Uh in your perusing of the dictionary you may want to give some thought to the sentence structure. It is a man (Martin Luther King) being subjugated to another man (Lyndon Baines Johnson). Nice try though. You really are desperate.

So now are you now calling John Edwards a sexist. After all he said,

"I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician."

And if you are a crusader defender of womens rights I can hardly see how it is you are going to willfully vote for the republican party In November. Look at how Tonya Melich, author of "The Republican War Against Women", des...

Uh in your perusing of the dictionary you may want to give some thought to the sentence structure. It is a man (Martin Luther King) being subjugated to another man (Lyndon Baines Johnson). Nice try though. You really are desperate.

So now are you now calling John Edwards a sexist. After all he said,

"I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician."

And if you are a crusader defender of womens rights I can hardly see how it is you are going to willfully vote for the republican party In November. Look at how Tonya Melich, author of "The Republican War Against Women", describes the republican party:

"The women's liberation movement believes in respect for the family and in the nurturing of children. It believes that family stability is enhanced by eliminating sexism so that respectful conduct between men and women can thrive. Yet this movement has been condemned by the ministers of the religious right - those of the Christian Coalition and their allies - who charge that it has caused women to betray their rightful roles as wives and mothers and to reject their children."

This is the republican party you are going to be voting for in November since you hate Obama and will not vote for him. Womem across the planet appreciate your support of them yance. Good job.