 masbury says: Yet again. May have been tortured. What a sick, sad situation.  Now the Pentagon is in the business of charging people? This guy wanted to be one of the hijackers. Trained to be one of the hijackers. He wanted to be a part of the death and destruction tha rained down on America and you are worried that they may have used harsh interrogations. Yeah, I worry, because torture is for cowards. If they had the goods on him the charges would have stuck, but they didn't it, so where is your proof that he did all that you said he did? This guy - like most of America's torture victims - is a suspect. He has been convicted of no crime, but has been imprisoned for years. Bush administrators are under pressure to produce convictions. You can bet that if they let this guy off they have an inescapable reason for doing so. If it's like it has been in so many of these cases, the evidence was so horribly thin that no court - even these military tribunals - would take it seriously. As for torture - it is in violation of international law, probably of US law, and it produces bad evidence. This case does involve a coerced and recanted testimony, thanks to torture. I fail to understand why causing the USA to ... And yeah, I too worry - because every time my country tortures, it diminishes its own greatness. I'm just as outraged that we would do such a thing as I am that he might have done such a thing. They differ only in degree. Even the FBI admits they have "no hard evidence linking bin Laden to 9/11 attacks". And the only prosecutions successful are those than gain "confession" by torture, because otherwise they lack any hard evidence accept the official story, based upon nothing. |
Related ClipsView the Top Clips from May 13, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
