"We report, you decide"? Not really. Just who is it that "hates our freedoms", really. Is it Islamists or the new media interventionists who decide for the public, censor debate, and control outcomes as much as possible.

It's time to boycott Fox news - a drop in ratings might just let them finally "get it" that we are not willing to be their sheep.

I doubt anyone who believes this story watches FOX News anyway.

PROPAGANDA
Ron Paul WAS invited.
He never responded.
The FOX debate was canceled, being so close to the ABC debate

Funny, the "regulars" are all up in a state of agitated flagellation once again ~ WITHOUT LOOKING PAST THE SHRIEKING CHOIR to get some facts.

The question is, who comes off looking worse here? The Ron Paul campaign who had access to the important information such as; Ron Paul was invited, Ron Paul never accepted the invitation, the event was canceled (at least they should have known that one), and that Paul was invited to a FOX debate just days later. Or was it the AP who has proven without a doubt that the so called professional media is just as likely to print rumors without doing any real journalism when those rumors coincide with their agenda (in this case, slamming FOX News).

Pop for the comments.

They cancelled it after the controversy, and for those who do read, the campaign directly contacted both FOX and the Republican NH committee. Maybe you should read what Fox does not report.

The other campaigns knew it was canceled about three weeks ago. And why would Paul be upset about not being listed as attending the debate when he didn't ever confirm his wish to attend? And why would they block him from one debate when inviting him to one four days later? Face it, Paul came out looking like a goober and the AP doesn't have any more credibility than a one man blog.

Regardless of the tit for tat Fox did/did not, Ron Paul did/did not, the head of the Republican party in New Hampshire would like for Fox to include more candidates.

It appears to me that the "SHRIEKING CHOIR OF RIGHTWINGERS" here are more concerned about defending FAUX NEWS than they are about doing what's best for their political party. Why is that? Could it be they have so invested so much psychic energy over the years in defending the blatant lie of "Fair and Balanced"?

LMAO.

n2sooners, do you really read anything? Here is the latest from CNN today which completely refutes everything you have said, including that the debate was cancelled:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/31/debate.limits.ap/index.html

But thanks for the pops and for proving that you got the entire story wrong.