masbury says: Inerrancy extremism leave us with no way to reconcile the sometimes cruel God of the Old Testament with the reconciling God of the New Testament. Inerrancy is only claimed in the "original languages", not in translations obviously, where men do err. Translation is everything when it comes to correct interpretation, in any historical document, not just the Bible. Thus "distorts our view of God" would have to be laid at the feet of loose or inaccurate translations of the Bible, not historically sound ones. Just who is really doing the distorting is the question. One more thought, Jesus said to the Pharisees (who even had the same belief), his accusers: ...and the scripture cannot be brokenSo Jesus plainly construed the scriptures as truth that could not be spoken against, but regarded as absolutely true, which he stated as a strong premise to his argument. Therefore, his position on scripture's inerrancy as a text is clearly underlined here. Blueridge, I do hope you'll read the paper from which this comes. History and scripture. Both written and preserved by those in control. To believe that the bible, in it's entire form, is the word of God is to, indeed, believe that God is a dangerously schizophrenic entity with a grudge against mankind. This is why one needs both faith, and critical thought. A critical examination of the bible reveals it for what it is — the Old Testament being a series of myths, mixed with the history of the Israelite people as they struggled to understand the nature of God. They started by assuming that the One God was just like their old gods; containing all the pros and cons of the people themselves; making them act "human" in their mythology. That is how they attributed God as having "Holy Wrath" and wanting his people to fear him. That ... |
View the Top Clips from October 17, 2009
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|