This raises a couple of issues.

1. One of the few options to do some serious organization and storing of online research is gone. I guess that leaves Diigo and Evernote. No offense to the Clipmarks guys, but I see Clipmarks as filling a different (but also important) niche, one more geared towards social news/sharing than research (namely because there is no way for a user to get an exhaustive list of their tags on Clipmarks, which is why I resorted to Evernote and Furl).
2. How much can we trust these Web 2.0 services to last? Furl transferred my clips to Diigo, but it looks like my cached copies are gone. Is there a good way to organize and store webpages that is guaranteed to last? I'm thinking local storage may be the only guarantee of that.

I am pretty bummed out about this.