Clipmarks
pokketsfollowshare
4-30-2008 10:36 AM203 views
pokkets says:
The cost of reprocessing low grade Uranium ore.
An industry spokesman said that there should be enough high quality ore for at least 85 years.
85 years when the waste lasts for an age?
Sounds brilliant.
Consider the amount of nuclear waste that will exist as a result of wasting energy.
3 Comments   | Add a Comment
4-30-2008 1:07 PM
papananook
what about reprocessing methods developed by thew French? (pleez, no French bashing)
5-2-2008 10:38 AM
gzuckier
"The cost of building a U.S. power plant has risen 130 percent since 2000, and 27 percent in the 12 months to October 2007 alone, according to a new index developed by Cambridge Energy Research Associates and released on Thursday."
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1339129420080214
That's risen BY 130%, i.e. more than doubled.

At this point, a new nuclear power plant would probably not be able to create power substantially below $0.15 a kilowatt-hour; in addition to the transmission and distribution costs; and that not for a couple of decades. Nuclear power is about the last form of electricity you would turn to if you care about price, or if you are in a hurry.

Upgrading current p...
6-11-2008 2:56 PM
gzuckier
not quite on topic regarding French reprocessing, but on a related note, the biggest, most advanced nuclear plant is being built in Finland by the leader in nuclear plant construction, Areva of France, and Siemens. and, well see for yourself:
"The reactor under construction at Olkiluoto [Finland] is the world's first third-generation nuclear power plant. Olkiluoto is also a pioneer insofar as the world's first facility for final disposal of high-level nuclear waste is being built there."
"The Finnish Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority has reported a considerable number of quality defects and operational anomalies which have resulted in delays to the project timetable. According to cur...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK