|
There better be because thats all that separates us from animals i always figured that it was thumbs -- ya know ? we have 'em - animals don't ...& too, that we have the decicion making ability,whereas animals don't.Maybe. Tuesday, February 07, 2006 This a long article but seems like worth a read with convenience. This is actually a good (& concise) introduction to the philosophy & science of consciousness; the history & evolution of that science & philosophy. I'd recommend everyone to read the full article. Nice find wildcat. But ending/concluding with an attempt to refute Dennett e.a. with the Penrose-Hameroff hypothesis (read: quantum quackery) is rather disappointing. Still the Penrose-Hameroff story opened a whole new debate a few years back, but I agree the end lets you down a bit. consciousness is still a tough cookie.. I kinda share Michael Shermer's view that we should concentrate on the neurological basis of a consciousness (and upper levels). 'Going quantum' on this is just another way to mystify it. In reality, the gap between subatomic quantum effects and large-scale macro systems is too large to bridge.As a sidenote: there's nothing wrong with opening the debate. So that part could be helpful. Though I am in principle much in favor (actually some call me an "emergentist") of the emergent concept, I doubt that emergence and self-organization alone can explain all of it. generally I like Shermer but at times he is a bit over-zealous in deconstructing what is merely a working hypothesis during research. of course the nonsense of that movie needed a good kick but mainly because it is bad science and bad philosophy. amazing however how well it was received in the world. |
View the Top Clips from October 17, 2006
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
|
New from the makers of Clipmarks: Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!
|
|