Go ahead - They are all clips that went private when you changed the cliplimit. Since nobody can FIND them as private I was just trying to spur some conversation with topics that interest me. I can revist each site and clip them within the limits as new clips but reclip is how I identify the clip as one that went private.
Is there a limit to how mant clips I am allowed to clip per hour? I know you limit the pops and comments. I didn't know you limit the clips. What is the limit?

it occupies the entire newest clips page

Only for a little while, then they get lost in the fray once again. The only way this could really be a problem is if nobody else is clipping. But seriously, wh...

Go ahead - They are all clips that went private when you changed the cliplimit. Since nobody can FIND them as private I was just trying to spur some conversation with topics that interest me. I can revist each site and clip them within the limits as new clips but reclip is how I identify the clip as one that went private.
Is there a limit to how mant clips I am allowed to clip per hour? I know you limit the pops and comments. I didn't know you limit the clips. What is the limit?

it occupies the entire newest clips page

Only for a little while, then they get lost in the fray once again. The only way this could really be a problem is if nobody else is clipping. But seriously, what is the difference if it is a reclip or an original in a clipseries? The only real difference is the way I title it and the fact that I clip the original clip title which allows a member to see the original non-limited clip.
Or are you just suggesting that I find another site to use? (Don't want to be too dense)
I have 5000 clips in my profile and I am not even close to being caught up with my bookmarks yet.

no, of course not. i was just talking about the re-clips. i don't really have any specific answers to your questions. it's a tough situation in my opinion. clipmarks is certainly one of the most open, user powered sites i know of. i often marvel at how well it functions, being that so many web sites are full of spam and over-the-top mean comment threads.

That said, it seems like there's just a balance that we hope to maintain that gives everyone a somewhat equal opportunity to get their clips seen and commented on - depending on the quality of the clips as determined by other users on the site. i'm sure the folks over at google could create an algorithm of some sort to deal with it, b...

no, of course not. i was just talking about the re-clips. i don't really have any specific answers to your questions. it's a tough situation in my opinion. clipmarks is certainly one of the most open, user powered sites i know of. i often marvel at how well it functions, being that so many web sites are full of spam and over-the-top mean comment threads.

That said, it seems like there's just a balance that we hope to maintain that gives everyone a somewhat equal opportunity to get their clips seen and commented on - depending on the quality of the clips as determined by other users on the site. i'm sure the folks over at google could create an algorithm of some sort to deal with it, but we just try to feel it out and speak about it when it seems necessary.

You certainly didn't do anything wrong and i know your intentions are always pure. It just seemed like a move that gave extra special attention to your clips - clips that seemed to have already had their day - so i thought it was fair to everyone else that they be removed from the public.

Believe me, i don't know the best way to handle all situations like this. i just try my best to stay as uninvolved as possible...and only get involved when it seems fair to everyone on the site.