But is it anti-Semitic to ask why the Palestinians should pay the price for the ghastly crime of the Germans? Why were the property rights of the German perpetrators sacrosanct and those of the guiltless Palestinians adjudged an acceptable casualty?

In U.S. foreign policy, not all racial groups are guaranteed the same rights and protections. Otherwise, why does the U.S. rightly defend Jewish people’s claims on EU bank accounts, property, and compensation for labour expropriated during the 1930s and 1940s, while quashing the rights of millions of Palestinians refugees to lands, houses, and goods stolen as a condition of Israel’s founding in the late 1940s?

As a nation we seem unconscious of the hypocrisy. The convention that persecuted Europeans had the right to safe havens on lands stolen from non-EU was, by the mid-20th century, as outmoded as the Confederacy’s defence of slavery in the mid-19th.

...Harvard Crimson

In America
"people tremble in the fear of losing their friends, jobs, advertising revenues, campaign contributions, and alumni donations if they question Zionism or Israeli policy—despite the billions of our tax dollars paid annually for Israel’s defense and sustenance.

Even the Israeli military hosts freer debates about this issue than any U.S. university does."

Land of the free and home of the brave?

ROFL!

It's not 'censorship' if he can go speak somewhere else.

(just like clipping here) Harvard is simply enforcing whom they wish to speak publicly and who won't.



Wait a minute...this sounds REAL FAMILIAR DOESN'T IT?

History never repeats. It has learned to paraphrase

Just how long ago was it that Jews weren't allowed into Harvard?

What?