The declaration "There is no God" is what is known as an absolute statement. For an absolute statement to be true, I must have absolute knowledge.
Here is another absolute statement: "There is no gold in China." For the statement to be true, I must know that there is no gold in China, or the statement is incorrect. To say "There is no God," and to be correct in the statement, I must be omniscient.
I must know how many hairs are upon every head, every thought of every human heart, every detail of history, every atom within every rock...nothing is hidden from my eyes...I know the intimate details of the secret love-life of the fleas on the back of the black cat of Napolean's great-grandmother....

The declaration "There is no God" is what is known as an absolute statement. For an absolute statement to be true, I must have absolute knowledge.
Here is another absolute statement: "There is no gold in China." For the statement to be true, I must know that there is no gold in China, or the statement is incorrect. To say "There is no God," and to be correct in the statement, I must be omniscient.
I must know how many hairs are upon every head, every thought of every human heart, every detail of history, every atom within every rock...nothing is hidden from my eyes...I know the intimate details of the secret love-life of the fleas on the back of the black cat of Napolean's great-grandmother. To make the absolute statement "There is no God." I must have absolute knowledge that there isn't one.

Had they read the whole thing they would have quickly found this portion :

You: Can you prove that God doesn't exist?

Me: I was waiting for this. No, it's illogical to
prove that anything doesn't exist, I can't prove that unicorns don't
exist, but I have no reason to believe they do. The burden of proof
always lies with the claimant, not the skeptic. It's YOUR god so the
burden of proof is in yours, not mine. If I professed that unicorns
existed, you'd insist that I produce one or shut up, right? But
here's a thought I'll bet you never considered.....IF there were a REAL
GOD who was concerned about humans, why are there so many different
religions?...

read more»

Had they read the whole thing they would have quickly found this portion :

You: Can you prove that God doesn't exist?

Me: I was waiting for this. No, it's illogical to
prove that anything doesn't exist, I can't prove that unicorns don't
exist, but I have no reason to believe they do. The burden of proof
always lies with the claimant, not the skeptic. It's YOUR god so the
burden of proof is in yours, not mine. If I professed that unicorns
existed, you'd insist that I produce one or shut up, right? But
here's a thought I'll bet you never considered.....IF there were a REAL
GOD who was concerned about humans, why are there so many different
religions? Wouldn't a REAL god unify the world into a cohesive common
religion? Perhaps if there were a REAL GOD, why would there be any need
for religion, at all? Religions exist to tell you about the god they
wished existed. A REAL GOD could tell you himself, obviating the need
for religion. The fact that over 2500 gods have been identified is
clear evidence that man makes the gods, not the other way around. By
the way, who was the last man that God saw fit to speak to? Was it Noah
or Moses?