(from the article)
"Why it's almost as if you have one way of speaking among the progressive elite and another language entirely for the rubes you'd presume to govern.
And which manner of speaking represents your real beliefs and expresses your real agenda? It's a mystery we'll never quite be able to puzzle out, I'm sure.

Which part of his statement is not true? It was probably not a politically savvy thing for him to say, but it was intellectually honest.

Actually, there are quite a few hicks that agree with him - my relatives, many of them farmers, are among them. And there's no reason for Obama to loose any sleep over votes those votes he would never get in the first place: the race-baiting, anti-immigration, gun totin' types that misuse religion.

So why did he win big in Iowa?