Shameful, but totally in keeping with the Bush Administration's policy of hiding the death and injury occurring in Iraq.

How surprising is that? It is more convenient to hide away images that might provoke anger about the war.

I agree this is disgraceful.

Although, to be clear, because the liberal blog was not. He could have gone if he wore pants.

" 'Are you telling me that I can't go to the ceremony 'cause I'm an amputee?' " David recalled asking. "She said, 'No, I'm saying you need to wear pants.'

You guys are all morons. http://z.about.com/d/urbanlegends/1/0/q/1/bush_jogging.jpg

http://amysrobot.com/files/amputee.jpg

http://bilesnarksneer.typepad.com/bile_snark_sneer/images/r2164897377.jpg

this myth is busted.

http://z.about.com/d/urbanlegends/1/0/q/1/bush_jogging.jpg

this myth is busted.

Good Point =)

Although, to be clear, because the liberal blog was not. He could have gone if he wore pants.

"
'Are you telling me that I can't go to the ceremony 'cause I'm an
amputee?' " David recalled asking. "She said, 'No, I'm saying you need to wear pants.'

It's interesting how they left that part out.

I don't understand, how is this a myth in the first place and how is it busted by you providing a picture of something totally different photo-op?

It was busted as being presented in an extremely biased fashion. The title would lead people to believe he was banned because he was an amputee, but the fact is he didn't get to go because he didn't want to follow the dress code.

the fact is he didn't get to go because he didn't want to follow the dress code.

Or a careful choreography of the amputees.

Or a careful choreography of the amputees.

Was anyone else allowed to attend wearing shorts?