B Rosen says: More from my Global Warming debunked research. This whole article was very interesting, i wish i could have clipped more before reaching the pop limit. I've seen this before ... When two side ignore the smaller details and focus on a large item that they can both argue over - and is difficult or near impossible to prove either way. Fact ... However small, tiny or arguably insignificance - every flame, even a single match - affects the air around it ... and so affect the atmosphere. Therefore ... It would be a good idea to limit that affect, to reduce the number of 'matches' to the lowest number possible. Why use a 'widget' that uses 10 'thingys', when you could use a 'whatsit' that only uses 9 'thingys' - you get the idea |
View the Top Clips from February 4, 2007
|
||
|
|
|||