Clipmarks
blueridgefollowshare
5-11-2008 11:37 PM233 views
blueridge says:
Exposes the real agenda and reasons for the U.S. and UN to force their way into Burma, as if only they can provide help, not just their neighboring countries they trust. Big article worth reading, this clip only introduces subject.

The Bush administration is no more motivated by humanitarian concerns in Burma than it is in Iraq or Afghanistan.
6 Comments   | Add a Comment
5-12-2008 7:06 AM
citizenbfk
Totally true .

Even if the Burma military junta are as bad as I've heard if you/we/I or a country wants to offer them aid, well, offer them aid, don't trash talk 'em.

It's like if you were hit by a drunk driver, lie bleeding on the ground, the police and ambulance come and while the ambulance stands by the police start asking the victim about past parking fines, etc.

It's like the Olympics...I know some good folks feel the Olympics is time to trash talk China but the whole idea of the Olympics is to forget the trash talk between nations for awhile and just play the games.
(The Dalai Lama, BTW, supports the Chinese Olympics).

Why is this done? Well....apparently, according to political r...
5-12-2008 9:11 AM
skwirlinator
with no soldiers , sailers or CIA)
Yea, uhugh, right
5-12-2008 3:09 PM
masbury
As of Saturday, the Myanmar gov't was unwilling to let most aid workers into the country, preferring instead to do all the food distribution themselves via their own army, and thus get the credit.
Amnesty International USA set up an email form for contacting the Myanmar ambassador. I guess the aid agencies are really experts at this, and armies aren't, and the death toll will be greatly diminished if agencies from around the world are allowed to bring their own personnel in, rather than merely pile food on the dock.
5-12-2008 8:12 PM
blueridge
Masbury, during chaos it is the duty of government to control who and what comes into their country, especially when they know that CIA ops are already at work planting "humanitarian workers" who foment "democratic" rebellion, protests, etc., under guise of caring for people but who are working for UN and US agencies for regime change.

Note the storm coincidentally struck just prior to the referendum on the new constitution (yes, US and UN and humanitarian groups claim a sham)--a free vote of the people--which was projected to cement the new government, which then could no longer be impugned as "secret junta" government, but constitutional, legal, and open.

You must not blindly believe whe...
5-12-2008 8:22 PM
blueridge
It is a ridiculous assertion that international aid "must" be permitted as if the people of a country are absolutely helpless without foreign aid. Those best qualified to give aid are countries, without political interest, closest to them as neighbors.

Burma opens up to international aid. Yes, from India, whom they trust. Would you let the US in? Does it HAVE to come from the US and UN agencies? Those who force their way and insist cannot, obviously, be trusted to work strictly for the benefit of "aid".

More propaganda, from the oh so trustworthy (ahem, CFR influenced) US media: [url=http:...
5-12-2008 9:21 PM
blueridge
See what Global Security, a neocon propaganda tank, thinks of the constitutional referendum here, in which they show the entire Congress was also tricked into endorsing. When you see the neocons and Congress united, be afraid of the results.

What we are witnessing now, in a historical pattern, is the tyranny of Democracy, which claims a majority or coalition of Congress, the US and allies, the UN, and the world, can condemn and intervene and overthrow countries for their own goal of global democracy, waging wars under the pretense of "human rights" and "peace" in the world. It is the most[b]...
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up





Embed This Clip In Your Site...


OK