Clipmarks
   
  
   
Kelikafollowshare
11-22-2008 7:44 PM
158 views
Kelika says:
"The EFF blasted the retroactive amnesty as a "blatant attempt to prevent this Court—and every other court, federal or state—from deciding whether the carrier defendants conducted dragnet, warrantless surveillance of millions of Americans' communications and communications records in violation of the Constitution and numerous statutes."

The government and the telecoms argued in earlier briefs that Congress can tinker with ongoing legislation without violating the Constitution and that citizens should sue the government, not private companies, over the spying."
1 Comment   | Add a Comment
11-22-2008 10:04 PM
Kreuzberg-Jakob
Be careful! You may threaten the National Security!
Are you a terrorist?
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK