He3 used as a fuel in a fusion reactor produces very little radioactive waste. What little it does produce has a very short half life of, if I recall correctly, about 75 years. The He3 reaction is not as damaging to the inner reactor walls.

I believe that it is also easier to get to fuse as well. I'm not 100% sure about this though.

It turns out that the moons soil is packed full of He3 and should be a fairly straight forward process to extract it from the lunar soil.

Because the fusion reaction of He3 produces very little radioactive waste and what little it does only stays radioactive for a short time, I do not think there would be much reason for people to protest the building...

He3 used as a fuel in a fusion reactor produces very little radioactive waste. What little it does produce has a very short half life of, if I recall correctly, about 75 years. The He3 reaction is not as damaging to the inner reactor walls.

I believe that it is also easier to get to fuse as well. I'm not 100% sure about this though.

It turns out that the moons soil is packed full of He3 and should be a fairly straight forward process to extract it from the lunar soil.

Because the fusion reaction of He3 produces very little radioactive waste and what little it does only stays radioactive for a short time, I do not think there would be much reason for people to protest the building of the He3 reactors.

The He3 on the moon is a big deal and is the reason so many countries are now working to get to the moon. Everyone wants to make sure they get to the moon so they can make their claim on their share of the He3. All you have to do is look at the number of countries that are spending large amounts of money to go to the moon to see just how big of a deal the He3 is. Russia, China, Japan, USA, EU all are working to go to the moon. I may even have left some out.