Clipmarks
jasontrommfollowshare
1-29-2007 9:05 AM
289 views
jasontromm says:
I'm glad to see some people are challenging the states mandates. I objected to my son's blood being sent to a state lab because they keep the blood for a certain period of time. I feel it's a violation of privacy for the state to keep anybody's DNA for any amount of time unless they've been convicted of a crime.
2 Comments   | Add a Comment
1-29-2007 10:18 AM
CrazyRedHead
"The mandatory test, in which a few drops of blood are drawn from a baby’s heel, screens for dozens of rare congenital diseases, some of which can cause severe mental retardation or death if left undetected."

Phenylketonuria -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenylketonuria

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAH

Galactosemia -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactosemia

A few drops of blood to prevent your newborn child's death or retardation - not a bad deal at all.
1-29-2007 11:40 AM
jasontromm
But when it's against your religious beliefs, you shouldn't be forced to have the test done. JW's always refuse blood transfusions. Scientologists and even some evangelical Christians believe in faith-healing so treating those diseases would be against their religious beliefs.
Login to Comment.  Not a member yet? Sign up
Embed This Clip In Your Site...

New from the makers of Clipmarks:  Amplify.com - Don't just share the news...Amplify it!

OK