krugman: climate change risk


	krugman: climate change risk

afrjc

7-29-2008 10:21 AM

73 views

tags:

climate change, global warming, urgency, urgent, risk, economics, catastrophic change, anthropogenic climate change, welfare

Add a Comment

Login to Comment. Not a member yet? Sign up

View the Top Clips from July 29, 2008

Embed This Clip In Your Site...

<div style="margin: 12px 0px; font-family: arial; color: #333333; background: #ffffff; border: solid 4px #e5e5e5; width: 100%; clear: left;"><div class="CM_CTB_Content_Wrap" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;background-color: #ffffff;"><div style="border-bottom: solid 1px #dcdcdc; white-space: nowrap; margin-bottom: 8px; background-color: #eeeeee ;background-image: url(http://www.clipmarks.com/images/source-bg.gif); background-repeat: repeat-x; height: 24px; line-height: 24px; vertical-align: middle; padding-bottom: 4px; color: #666666; font-size: 10px;" ><a href="http://clipmarks.com/clip-to-blog/" title="see clips that are hot right now"><img src="http://content.clipmarks.com/blog_embed/4316079c-445c-4c55-9e67-e1acb254dc86/D63EFF0B-DB34-4E92-98AE-828F32B34493/" alt="" width="19" height="19" border="0" style="vertical-align: middle; margin: 0px 4px; display: inline; border: none; float:none;" /></a>clipped from <a title="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/economics-of-catastrophe/" href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/economics-of-catastrophe/" style="font-size: 11px;">krugman.blogs.nytimes.com</a></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/economics-of-catastrophe/"><SMALL id="day_29" class="post-date">July 29, 2008,  8:22 am</SMALL>
<H2 class="post-title">Economics of catastrophe</H2></blockquote><div style="height: 2px; font-size: 2px; background: #dcdcdc; border-bottom: solid 1px #f5f5f5; margin: 2px 4px;"></div><blockquote style="text-align: left; padding: 0px 8px; margin: 4px 0px 8px 0px; background: transparent; border: none;" cite="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/economics-of-catastrophe/"><P>on any sort of expected-welfare calculation, the small probability of catastrophe dominates the expected loss. Suppose that there’s a 99% chance that Lomborg is right, but a 1% chance that catastrophic climate change will reduce world GDP by 90%. You might be tempted to disregard that small chance — but if you’re even moderately risk averse (say, relative risk aversion of 2 — econowonks know what I mean), you quickly find that the expected loss of welfare isn’t 0.5% of GDP, it’s 10% or more of GDP.</p> <P>The question is, can we mobilize people to make modest sacrifices to protect against low-probability catastrophes in the distant future?</P></blockquote></div><div style="margin: 0px 6px 6px 4px;"><table style="font-size: 11px;border-spacing: 0px;padding: 0px;" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tr><td style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;">&nbsp;</td><td align="right" style="background:transparent;border-width:0px;padding:0px;width:107px" width="107"><a href="http://clipmarks.com/share/D63EFF0B-DB34-4E92-98AE-828F32B34493/blog/" title="blog or email this clip"><img src="http://content6.clipmarks.com/images/c2b-foot.png" border="0" alt="blog it" width="107" height="17" style="border-width:0px;padding:0px;margin:0px;" /></a></td></tr></table></div></div>