 jatfla says: This article makes so much sense!! FTA: "One can expect they will keep their pledges of peace the way Yevgeny Primakov (another Russian prime minister of KGB extraction) and Victor Chernomyrdin promised Bill Clinton and Al Gore to limit arms transfers and nuclear development to North Korea, Iran and Syria during the 1990s." jatfla- Not all western analysts have been fooled. You may want to read up on this subject- The Perostroika Deception, if you a little time. Will put alot of world events into perspective and you will start to understand a much bigger picture. Real...I know that not all western analysts have been fooled...It's just been a while since I've read something like this! Thanks Good link, Napster. Thanks. I have always thought that it is foolish to believe that the Communists of the former Soviet Union just all of sudden, out of the blue, realized the wrong path of Communism and gave up. They would probably do like most Libertarians would do, if the US had collapsed to Communism, and that would be to fight the good fight underground. The world stage is ripe for materialism, internationalism, globalism, and fascism. That will never change. Gorbechev's work in San Francisco as a Global Warming and environmentalist charlatan is paying off. "that the Communists of the former Soviet Union just all of sudden, out of the blue, realized the wrong path of Communism and gave up" Russia and the Soviet Union before it has not been ruled by people who believe in communism for decades. Both Russia and China are ruled by people who want to remain in power. Russia's current moves have been a long time coming - they have been very clear that they consider nearby neighbors considering joining NATO as a direct threat to their security. This is their response, and it is a message to their neighbors that the US and Europe cannot protect them and they had better take Russia's interests into account. If Russia has read the situation correctl... While others have commented on Russia as portrayed in the clip -- quite correctly imo -- my only addition would be to affirm the portrayal of the NeoCons. Whether the philosophy is marxism or neoconservatism, the appeal to utopianism is a sure sign of warning. Replacing the big government, NWO vision of the future by the Democratic party with a nearly identical vision except for the fact that it is dominated by GOP pols instead, is not a future to which I aspire. DeMaistre is right on the mark. The neoconservatives are NOT conservative, but liberals from the Left, and so continue militancy and wars for Democracy toward "global hegeomony", to used their own words. Now if only n2sooners could see just how "liberal" the policies he supports are, without more careful evaluation. This also explains why Clinton's Kosovo and Bush's Iraq are so much alike, yet republicans condemned Clintons war and Macedonians called him "Butcher of the Balkans". |
View the Top Clips from August 19, 2008
Embed This Clip In Your Site...
|
|
|
|
