More dogma and witnessing without substance. Here he uses his lack of scientific understanding of evolution to back up his "argument".

He sounds afraid.

The notion that science has disproved - or will one daydisprove - the existence of God is one of the great lies of our generation.

Saying its a lie is a bit overblown in my eyes. A lie requires a lair and something this widely thought I would not call a lie as much as a mis-understanding. Science deals with the physical universe, not the non-material world of religion and faith. Science has nothing to say about that realm.

Science deals with the physical universe, not the non-material world of religion and faith.

Yet theists feel quite comfortable to use science to "prove" their dogma. If they go down that road then it seems that they ought to be held accountable to the same scrutiny we use on all other claims in this world.

In agreement.