4
POPSRunning away - CLIMATE CHANGE: Arctic Shelf Leaking Potent Greenhouse Gas The tar sands oil mining and giant hydro dams in Canada are making what is obviously a very dangerous situation for the whole world very, very much worse. The process is being aided and abetted by the US federal government which is keen to import oil from the tar sands, although some State governments want to ban it.
2
POPSHYDRO: Both victim and perpetrator of climate change - A question of consequences Our first mini-report is the result of an analysis of 722 selected key clips on all Energy Sectors collected over the past three years from reputable published sources. Even though the numbers are relatively small, the findings are significant ... and free for Amplifiers to Amplify. Also thanks to Eric and Amplify for enabling the initial compilation process.
0
POPSAmerica 'imports' pollution from Asia Another consequence of the Walmart economy. These issues should be central all trade negotiations. See also: http://openintelligence.amplify.com/2010/01/23/us-raises-concern-over-china-oil-policy/
1
POPSChinese economy records fastest growth since financial crisis erupted All those bank loans for building unnecessary real estate and factories. The game is liable to switch from bank stimulous to bank bailouts, once the bubble bursts. The Chinese government saw what happened in Japan before the crash, and then the US, and they go and make exactly the same mistake. Why are economic policy makers, whatever their nationality, so stupid?
4
POPSArctic permafrost leaking methane at record levels, figures show Of course, Canada Tar Sands oil mines have been pouring huge amounts of C02 right into the heart of the Arctic for decades, and the criminal Canadian goverment plans to increase production (therefore emissions) without any meaningful controls. And the US has approved the building of a new pipeline over the melting tundra. Canadian governments, both Federal and Provincial, should be held accountable by the rest of the world for the consequences.
2
POPS Who says it's green to burn woodchips? Almuth Ernsting from Biofuelwatch said: "It's almost unbelievable that we're creating vast areas of monoculture, mile after mile, just to be cut down as fast as they grow, to be shipped thousands of miles to be burned just for people's electricity. It just doesn't make sense. What about all the habitat that gets destroyed along the way?" Arrrghhh!!!! Please pass on ... retweet ... whatever. Somewhere I line must be drawn. See how woodlands can support multiple livings, and how complex they really are... www.worldwidewood.wordpress.com.
2
POPSEarth will be OK, but for us it's not so good Now it is the New Scientist saying that the best we can expect is a collapse of civilisation. This model assumes a 4 C increase. Today I clipped the latest predictions indicating a 6.3 C degree increase. See http://openintelligence.amplify.com/2009/10/05/new-analysis-brings-dire-forecast-of-63-degree-temperature-increase/.