3
POPSBBC on 9/11 Bldg 3: The Lie from the Ministry of Truth BBC "Conspiracy Files" says National Institute of Standards and Technology has "solved" the reason for Bldg 3 mystery "collapse" (ed. perfect crimping and symmetrical demolition from floor up at about the speed of gravity). They will officially lie now and BBC is trying to persuade the public just as George Orwell warned about the Ministry of Truth. Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (a very formidable group of accredited engineers in building structures) rebuts the lie saying "it's impossible".
5
POPSLieberman Warns of a 9/11 in 2009 for McCain
Islamo propaganda from this Israeli-neoconservative democrat. Is it not more evident just who was behind 9/11 and the absolutely unproven claims that "Islamic extremists"--i.e. bin Laden who denied it, and 19 Muslims, half of which were proven alive afterward--did it? Who benefits from 9/11 and this propaganda more than Israel and the neoconservative agenda for a new middle east? We know who would be behind it if another occurs, the same behind the first one. For Lieberman to "predict" this demonstrates inside knowledge (if it happens) and a clear motive on his part for even desiring it to push the war agenda. Lieberman's argument is also entirely irrational. If Islamic extremists want the U.S. out of the middle east and wars halted, they would do nothing at all. There has been nothing prohibiting repeated terrorism if those blamed for 9/11 were true and Al Qaeda was not in Iraq. Motive, means, and opportunity point to the real perpetrators per criminology 101.
1
POPSFeds Settle Lawsuit, $5.8 Million for Anthrax "Person of Interest" Huge cover-up in the anthrax case, and the media is to blame for not questioning the motives, story, of the government looking into this man publicly: The statement also blamed journalists for not questioning the motives of the government's statements or its tactics. Now look at the terms in which the government settled this out of court. Why not let it go to trial instead of paying up? The only motive could be to cover-up the truth of what happened and silence his legal allegations: "The United States does not admit to any violation of the Privacy Act and continues to deny all liability in connection with Dr. Hatfill's claims," So the Feds pay the man $5.8 million for nothing? It was not "Islamo Fascists" who wrote "Allah is great" on the anthrax letters...it was a false flag directed at Leahy and Daschle in Congress! See the 9/11 Anthrax Frame Up
2
POPSBush Wants Bin Laden "Dead or Alive"--Again! Right! Too bad he already died in Dec. 2001, which is why Bush suddenly lost interest ("I'm really not that concerned about one man"), and the CIA closed down its Bin Laden unit. Scenario: use UK Special Ops and UAV drones and fire a missile at a "safe house" near the Paki border, then claim to have killed Bin Laden--great propaganda! Especially if done before Sept. 11, 2008. It's all a lie, and Bush knows it, which is why he has been caught contradicting himself many times. Or, just ask the neocon contractors like SITE, let them track the websites of the "bin Laden videos" that keeping popping up before elections! Surely they could find the source of those videos, if they wanted. The FBI does not list 9/11 on Bin Laden's wanted poster, and they say "there is no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11".
0
POPSArizona State Senator(R): 9/11 Controlled Demolition Her commentary appeared in this newspaper. She makes a well sustainable argument that cannot be denied has merit. • The theory that the buildings collapsed due to controlled-demolition explosives, however, is consistent with scientific principles and the facts. The “demolition” theory, in fact, is the only one which scientists have been able to corroborate. That is, “… all observations are in accord with the use of explosives in a time sequence.” (Legge and Szamboti, December, Journal of 9/11 Studies.) The events of 9/11 led immediately to the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and passage of the Patriot Act (what double-speak), both of which deprive us of Constitutional rights and have brought us to the brink of becoming a police state. Homeland Security is currently trying to force a national ID card down our throats, although some governors have politely (or not so politely) told Secretary Michael Chertoff where he can go.
0
POPSAirliness Blame FBI, CIA in 9/11 Lawsuits The official story (Lie) has this problem to deal with now, since the "intelligence failure" falls apart from the point of view of the agencies named who claim that there were indications, but now refuse to testify in court about it in lawsuits against the airlines. If you assume the official story (blindly, contrary to the evidence) to be true, then why have not any government agencies been faulted for failure to protect America on 9/11, including NORAD? George Tenant instead won a medal of freedom (and that for covering another "intelligence failure" about WMD in Iraq). In the lawsuit against the CIA, companies including American Airlines Inc., United Airlines Inc., US Airways Group Inc., Delta Air Lines Inc., Continental Airlines Inc. and The Boeing Co. are seeking to interview the deputy chief of the CIA's bin Laden unit in 2001, and an FBI special agent assigned to the unit at that time. The names of both are secret.
2
POPSLikudnik Netanyahu (Israel) Calls 9/11 Good for Israel. Yes we know, the neoconservatives agree, which is why a UN representative is now saying the neocons (Israeli firsters) should be investigated about 9/11 (see previous Clipmark). Meanwhile, same article quotes Ahmadinejad of Iran calling 9/11 "suspicious" and convenient for a pretext for war: "Four or five years ago, a suspicious event occurred in New York. A building collapsed and they said that 3,000 people had been killed but never published their names," Ahmadinejad told Iranians in the holy city of Qom. "Under this pretext, they attacked Afghanistan and Iraq and since then, a million people have been killed only in Iraq." Of course then Netanyahu calls him Hitler. You are familiar with the propaganda by now. Netanyahu also made this statement immediately after 9/11 as well.
5
POPSBush Talks of Another 9/11, Points to Pakistan Assigning blame to a particular country in advance is not only suspicious, but it suggests that a new war theatre is about to open. Ironically, the Pakistani ISI wired $100,000 to Mohammad Attah (one of the key patsies used for 9/11 blame, without evidence) just prior to 9/11. Who wants to wager if another "catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" will happen before Bush leaves office and before the November elections? It would be too convenient, and benefit only the neocon war agenda. "Motive, means, opportunity" are the key considerations for determining who is behind an event. Israel and the neocons would benefit most and have more means and opportunity, and the ability to cast blame through well placed propagandists into the MSM--just as they benefited most from 9/11, to execute their blueprint for a "new middle east" via "regime change".
1
POPS9/11: UN Official Calls for Study of Neocons Role This is a major story breaking. The New York Sun is interestingly giving air to it, but you can be sure the propagandists will jump on this to try to discredit the UN official immediately. What is interesting is that he is an Israeli policy watcher from Princeton University and here he is saying there is significant and due cause for "suspicion" in looking at the neoconservatives' role in 9/11, which many claim was a "false flag" attack to blame Arabs and trigger the neocon agenda outlined by the Project for New American Century and their blueprint for a "new middle east" via wars for "regime change". Most of the neoconservatives are pro-Zionist Jews with close alliances to the Israeli radical Likudnik party, with Benjamin Netanyahu. In fact, Larry Silverstein, lease-holder of the WTC complex (who purchased the lease only months prior to 9/11) is close personal friends with Netanyahu.
0
POPSArchitects and Engineers Respond to WTC Inquiry Richard Gage is a formidable and reputable architect who has established this increasingly powerful group challenging the official story of 9/11. Undisputed Facts Point to the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7. The evidence for the Twin Towers also points to the same. It is irrational, from a physics standpoint, to believe otherwise. The official story of 9/11 is the foundational premise, still, for an entire foreign policy of "regime change" and domestic agenda enabling an anti-constitutional police state that is "altering our way of life" (as we are told "terrorists" want to do). Show the truth of 9/11 and the entire neocon agenda collapses into rubble. The website for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is here.
2
POPS9/11 Protester Arrested, Clinton Defends Official Story "an Osama bin Laden job", says Bill. Prove it Bill. The FBI has stated there is "no hard evidence linking bin Laden to 9/11"--Rex Tomb, FBI spokesman--which is why is Wanted poster at FBI does not list 9/11 attacks on his record. This is the most important and foundational issue for every present war, foreign policy, domestic spying, REAL ID, PATRIOT ACT, etc....and BOTH CORRUPT PARTIES support the IRRATIONAL AND CONTRADICTED story of who was behind 9/11! As long as THIS is believed a Democrat will be as bad as a Republican in the White House. People need to deal with this issue. It is fundamental to everything.
2
POPSOscar-winniing Actress Talks of 9/11 ..challenging the official orthodoxy is politically incorrect still. Of course the MSM, beholden to the Zionist agenda for wars for democracy in the middle east, will incite populist opinion against her. The official story of 9/11 is to be taken on blind faith.
4
POPS9/11 CONTRADICTIONS: Open Letter to Congress and the Press David Ray Griffin is about to unleash truth about 9/11 in a very powerful manner in this book to be released soon. His tenacity is an example of how to push truth against propaganda by this bull dog who will not let go of the bone he has to pick with the official story. Also, listen to him on the Charles Goyette radio show in Phoenix, AZ recently where he brings out the FACT that the FBI says Ted Olson's (who represented Bush and Cheney before the Supreme Court in the Election 2000 controversy vs. Gore) story about a cell phone call from his wife on Flight 77 is not and cannot be true! (This story made Digg). The clip on the audio link about the FBI and Ted Olson's statement is about 80% into the interview.
2
POPS"War on Terrorism" is for US Global Hegemony Read this classic entirely from the British MP in 2003. It details the neocon blueprint, from the Project for a New American Century, including the suspicious nature of the 9/11 "attacks". The neocon blueprint he refers to in this article was written in Sept. 2000, one year prior to 9/11, the "catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor" that precisely fit their own words, perfectly, to justify execution of the plan. It's plain evidence of a conspiracy, well documented. Republishing this here because too many have still not seen this or forgot about it.
4
POPS9/11 Commission Head Shielded Bush It was not an "independent investigation" and do recall that Bush and Cheney resisted any investigation until it was pushed, then they appointed Zelikow to head it. Google David Ray Griffin's book on the 9/11 Commission, since he was first to document this fact highlighted now more publicly.
0
POPS9/11: Surveillance Cam Proves Pentagon "Attack" a Fraud Surveillance cams vs. 9/11 official story. Funny how surveillance cameras are being heralded by government as able to provide definitive proof of crimes and perpetrators, yet they do not stick with such video evidence when it comes to the official story of 9/11. Instead you must believe their version, even if the video contradicts or fails to support it. Bear in mind that a fabricated story of 9/11 amounts to criminal perjury, fraud, and conspiracy to deceive the American people, and its representatives in Congress. Here is the Pentagon "attack" in live time.
5
POPSUnraveling the Myth of Al Qaida (Al CIA-duh) Truth (and fiction) of Al Qaeda fully disclosed! Note the CIA, the Saudis and Paki ISI enabled this militant group from start, and bin Laden's involvement was as a CIA asset to coordinate the Islamist resistance freedom fighters of Afghanistan against the Soviets. Al Qaeda is in essence fiction, translated meaning "base" for a database of volunteers. Note how Pakistan, thus Musharraf, is highly involved in this work of fiction. This is also why bin Laden's published denial of involvement or knowledge of 9/11, prior to his death, was published in a Karachi Pakistan newspaper (picked up by BBC Monitoring service) but censored by U.S. media, except CNN (note the duplicity of U.S. media, serving Zionist interests in self-censorship of this denial on Sept. 28, 2001).
2
POPSMore September 11ths -- A Pattern? Criminology 101 includes the observation of "signatures" by criminals that leave their mark, a pattern in their crimes. Remember Clinton rejected the neocons plan to take down Saddam and was shortly thereafter "Lewinskied". Did anyone recall that the Cessna that crashed into the Clinton White House was also done on Sept. 11th? There appears to be a pattern to Sept. 11th in the recent decade. (Freemasons also killed Morgan on Sept. 11th which led to the anti-masonry movement in the 1800s--the first "third party" in America. The number or derivatives of 11 is common superstitious practice of numerology for Masonic dates and ceremonial events).
2
POPS9/11 Commission Says CIA Lied and Impeded Investigation Caught in a lie. "Whatever is hidden shall be revealed...". The truth has a way of surfacing. So the CIA it appears is guilty of perjury, yet Bush gave Tenent the American Freedom medal. Of course both Bush and Cheney also testified (but not under oath and not published) before the Commission, but there is no record of that (so no record of lies).
4
POPSBush Began Spying on Americans Feb. '01 Note this is well before 9/11, yet the official story by the administration is that it received no notification of any national threat, while in stealth it began comprehensive spying on American citizens, to which the telecom companies objected upon legal grounds as contrary to their obligations to protect consumer rights even from government demands. Further consider that the government could have issued "warrants" for such if it indeed had any "probable cause" with specific evidence to justify it. The fact that Bush government did not issue warrants, or attempt to get them, proves it was trying to circumvent the law, and the Constitution, to spy on Americans secretly, in order to do so in stealth. Such a secret pattern by government, before 9/11, could be regarded as evidence of secrecy and providing for its own security, not against foreign terrorists, but from the American people at large, whom its surveillance plans desired to freely sift through.
1
POPSPEARL HARBOR: DAY OF DECEIT Read for yourself about FDR's deliberate plan to provoke a Japanese attack (using the Pacific Fleet put way out to sea as bait) in order to get the U.S. to enter Britain's war against Germany, when Americans and Congress had no desire to enter that war. Then recall the Project for New American Century's "blueprint" for a "new middle east", written in Sept. 2000, one year prior to 9/11, which talked about overturning Iraq, Syria, Iran, hinged upon "a catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor". For those who examine the evidence it can be seen that a secretive cabal took a play out of FDR's play book for the same over-arching reason, i.e. global democracy.
1
POPSOVERBLOWN: The U.S. Over-reaction to 9/11 You remember about the boy and the Emporer's New Clothes? Well the professor who wrote this book dares to stop the irrational over-reaction and insane wars and put the "terrorist threat" into statistical perspective that no one can refute. Multitudes more people die in traffic accidents in a year and you have (statistically) more chance of being killed by local criminal acts than from "Islamic jihadists that want to kill us every day". This book refutes the fear-mongering and propaganda, and is the rational basis for repealing the anti-constitutional and tyrannical laws that have been coerced through Congress by the mantra that "911 changed everything". No, it only changed what the government told us, which is full of lies. This book also is the basis for refuting most of the agenda proclaimed by the 2008 Presidential candidates (except Ron Paul) who want to continue down the road from freedom to fascism and their global Democratic Jihad for "regime changes".
3
POPS9/11: Laser guide lights on South Tower before strike; remote control evidence Laser spotting on South Tower of WTC before impact of 2nd plane. Lasers of course are used in military technology to fly missiles into targets by remote control. Also, video shows several shots of mystery white plane (no markings) and rare footage of Shanksville with empty hole, no wreckage. "The process of transformation (PAX AMERICANA war for "new middle east") might be a long one, absent some catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor". --Project for a New American Century neoconservative think tank; paper Rebuliding America's Defenses, composed Sept. 2000, one year prior to 9/11. Members included Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, etc. The neoconservatives have close ties with Israel and especially Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likudnik (terrorist) party. Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC, is close friends with Netanyahu. Senator Richard Hollings also stated Iraq war was "for Israel...and everyone knows
Clips
Pops
Comments
Tags
6
Most Pops
Print
Save
Turn on live update