11
POPSFederal Air Marshals Too Busy Being Criminals to Protect You The Federal Air Marshal Service presents the image of an elite undercover force charged with making split-second decisions that could mean the difference between stopping a terrorist and shooting an innocent passenger. The Department of Homeland Security's inspector general also flagged gaps in the background checks. "We can reassure the public that these dedicated professionals go out there every day and put their lives on the line to make sure that everyone is safe," Bray says. Before 9/11, the Air Marshal Service was a nearly forgotten force of 33 agents with a $4.4 million annual budget. Now housed in the Transportation Security Administration, the agency has a $786 million budget and an estimated 3,000 to 4,000 air marshals, although the official number is classified.
0
POPSI'm the sheriff, I can do what I want Haidl told jurors he and Carona made an initial list of 86 people — friends, family and contributors to Carona — who should become reserves. In 2001, a state commission decertified 86 reserves because of a lack of training and failure to pass background checks. It was unclear Friday whether that group was the same 86 mentioned in Haidl’s testimony. Haidl had earlier testified that he and Carona wanted to expand the program to 1,000 people, and that they wanted reservists to be mostly professionals who could donate a total of $1 million to Carona’s future campaign coffers
2
POPSObama's Citizenship Lawsuit The media is doing background checks on Joe the Plumber, but ignoring Obama's refusal to show his citizenship papers after court order?
0
POPSBackground Check this article makes sense, we usually ignore criminal background checks before hiring someone, worth saving.
1
POPSGOV NOT PREPARED FOR TRANSITION OF POWER "For a first-ever presidential transition in an era of terrorism,..." "the first presidential transition for U.S. counterterrorism agencies formed after the 2001 terrorist attacks,..." HUH? WAS TRANSITION OF POWER NOT AN OPTION IN 2004? EVIDENTLY NOT...
0
POPSEmployers background checks We are a leading national business discount online provider of search people, background check, cheap public record information and retrieval about individuals and companies http://www.backgroundrecord.com/
0
POPSfederal background checks We are a leading national business discount online provider of search people, background check, cheap public record information and retrieval about individuals and companies.
3
POPSAirport Screeners Swiping Your Stuff? According to this blogger, the Transportation Security Administration has a little stealing situation on their hands. What are they allegedly taking? Everything from an engagement ring to cash to designer eyewear to electronics. How can you safeguard your belongings? Elliot's recommendations include leaving valuables at home or taking them with you on the plane instead of putting them into a checked bag.
0
POPSGuide to Background Checks Gives a complete picture of the importance of employee screening to avoid fraud and other losses attached to employing the wrong employees.
3
POPSThe fine line between our public & private lives online Here is another article about how public and private lives are no longer being separated on the web. I have discussions about this all the time with my friends and peers about the etiquette and propriety needed online, especially in a field where so many kids can find you if you are not careful. Our behavior online is so important now because, as I have recently experienced, it is so easy for my students to find me online. I have resorted to putting a lot of things "private" or "friends & family only" and am using a social networking blog site that has privacy options. I also wonder about when or if there will ever be a line between private and public life. It is disappearing. Insurance & employers are penalizing individuals who smoke AT HOME and employers are viewing individuals MySpace or Facebook pages. When does it stop? Will it? When is it viewed as encroaching on individuals rights or lives?