Search Results

104 results for the search term: constitutional authority
Add Clipmarks to:  iGoogle  Netvibes  
   
 
 
 
   
 
top scroll end
12
POPS
After The Imperial Presidency
debbyski
by debbyski  11-9-2008    4
 No Remarks
2
POPS
The Message Of Obama's Socialist Realism Art
merrie
by merrie  10-30-2008    5
 And Senator Obama’s supporters insist that their dear leader has nothing to do with socialist/Marxist leanings, thoughts, beliefs? Next time they tell you that, just point out the Fairey “Hope” button they wear on their lapel, or the one they are sporting as a sticker on their car. The similarities between the Soviet, Cuban, Chinese Communist and Barack Obama propaganda posters are not coincidental. Barack Obama is a collectivist, a far-Left socialist who has attracted and has the support of radical groups, including the Communist Party Illinois, Socialist Party USA, The Center for Constitutional Rights and The Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. The Obama “Progress” poster was designed by leftwing (surprise!) artist Shepard Fairey. A similar poster by Fairey, with the word “change” on it is sold by Barack Obama’s online campaign store.
2
POPS
Another Lawsuit Demanding Verification of Obama’s Citizenship Status
merrie
by merrie  10-21-2008    2
 The complaint seeks specifically that the office of the Washington Secretary of State verify and certify that Mr. Obama is or is not a "natural born" citizen by producing original or certified verifiable official documents. The lawsuit argues that this certification should take place before the election to preclude a constitutional crisis and likely civil unrest should such certification, after the election, prove that Mr. Obama was not qualified for office. The Complaint argues that the Secretary of State has the authority and duty to not only certify the voters but also and most importantly the candidates and in so doing prevent the wholesale disenfranchisement of voters who would had had an opportunity to choose from qualified candidates had the certification preceded the election process. At this point, Mr. Obama has not allowed independent or official access to his birth records nor supporting hospital records.
6
POPS
The Noose Tightens
brightlight4
by brightlight4  10-20-2008    3
  Noose Tightens Category: Depopulation, FISA, Globalization, Issues, NAFTA, News, North American Union, Patriot Act, Police State, Real id, Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, Voting Rights & Fraud, War on Civil Liberties | “Since 9/11, our Constitutional rights have been systematically dismantled: 1. USA Patriot Act - A 342 page document presented to Congress one day before voting on it that allows the government access to your bank and email accounts, as well as your medical and phone records with no court order. They can also search your home anytime without a warrant. 2. USA Patriot Act II - This one allows secret government arrests, the legal authority to seize your American citizenship, and the extraction of your DNA if you are deemed a potential terrorist. 3. Military Commissions Act of 2006 - Ends habeas corpus, the right to an attorney, and the right to court review of one’s detention and arrest. Without this most basic right, all other ri
0
POPS
US Senate passes Wall Street bailout bill
deadcowkid
by deadcowkid  10-2-2008   
 "Majority Leader Reid, a Nevada Democrat, exercised his authority to attach the bailout plan to an unrelated piece of legislation already on the Senate calendar, a bill that mandated equal treatment by healthcare insurers for mental and physical illnesses. This parliamentary maneuver allowed the Senate to evade the constitutional requirement that all spending legislation originate in the lower house."
1
POPS
The emperor king of America...
earnric
by earnric  9-24-2008   
 And we impeached Clinton for lying about a blow job?
9
POPS
Is It Constitutional? No
sahara
by sahara  9-23-2008    2
 Section 8 of the Paulson proposal must be stripped in its entirety. There can be no vagueness, no gray area. Otherwise, the treasury secretary would become a more powerful -- and unaccountable -- figure even than our powerful and unaccountable president. And, as such, he would be operating in direct conflict with the Constitution. The nation's essential document makes it clear that every member of the executive branch is subject to legislative and judicial review. Congress cannot delegate its oversight authority to a cabinet member, even in a time of turmoil. The opening section of the Constitution gives all -- emphasis on all -- legislative authority to the House and Senate. Under the well-established constitutional doctrine of nondelegation, Congress cannot cede that power in the manner that Paulson's draft plan proposed -- or, for that matter, in any manner whatsoever.
0
POPS
Send a history-making message to Congress:
shankargallery
by shankargallery  9-1-2008   
 http://kucinich.us/
1
POPS
'Justice' Dept. Wants to Erase 4th Amendment, FBI to Have Gestapo Power
blueridge
by blueridge  8-22-2008   
 Attorney General Mukasey (neocon) wants to give broad powers to the FBI as if the 4th amendment is nothing at all instead of supreme law. The Justice Department said Wednesday that in light of requests from members of Congress for more information, Mr. Mukasey would agree not to sign the new guidelines before a Sept. 17 Congressional hearing. Can you believe this absolute corruption and blatant attempt to usurp power for federal policing? There will actually be a hearing in America's Congress to determine whether the 4th amendment will still stand--which forbids searches without probable cause! This right after the annual Sept. 11th propaganda campaign to justify ANY NEW POWERS the government wants, the Constitution notwithstanding. Mukasey has no Constitutional authority to sign or authorize this (the Constitution is above Mukasey, as well as Bush and Congress), but he wants to, after a good propaganda campaign to justify it as "necessary".
0
POPS
August 21st, This Day In History
merrie
by merrie  8-21-2008   
 In 1893, a group of American expatriates and sugar planters supported by a division of U.S. Marines deposed Queen Liliuokalani, the last reigning monarch of Hawaii. One year later, the Republic of Hawaii was established as a U.S. protectorate with Hawaiian-born Sanford B. Dole as president. Many in Congress opposed the formal annexation of Hawaii, and it was not until 1898, following the use of the naval base at Pearl Harbor during the Spanish-American War, that Hawaii's strategic importance became evident and formal annexation was approved. Two years later, Hawaii was organized into a formal U.S. territory. During World War II, Hawaii became firmly ensconced in the American national identity following the surprise Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. In March 1959, the U.S. government approved statehood for Hawaii, and in June the Hawaiian people voted by a wide majority to accept admittance into the United States.
4
POPS
Opposition stalks ‘vulnerable’ president
amgumen
by amgumen  8-17-2008   
 tional way to force early elections
1
POPS
Jury Nullification Nullified
bmeuppls
by bmeuppls  8-15-2008    1
  Young tried to assure the jury that the federal drug laws are constitutional because the Supreme Court has interpreted the commerce clause quite expansively. I'm glad someone is questioning the expansive interpretations some on the bench have about the constitution.
4
POPS
Mortgaged to the World
JICWyllie
by JICWyllie  7-29-2008   
 No Remarks
1
POPS
War Powers Revamp Recommended
Wisco
by Wisco  7-8-2008   
 One things for sure, recent history shows it's way too easy to go to war. Congress has totally shirked their responsibility, voting to "give authority" to a president to go to war, rather than sitting down and debating the merits of the action. One guy should never have that ability or responsibility. If Congress won't take its constitutional duty seriously, then a law that makes it a requirement might be just what we need.
1
POPS
FISA
sillysam
by sillysam  7-6-2008   
 This is a great article outlining exactly what the Presidential power is and his responsibilities to the FISA court are.
1
POPS
Judge Rejects Bush's View on Wiretaps
tabsey
by tabsey  7-6-2008   
 Seems many are distancing themselves from the Dick'n'George stamp.
11
POPS
Democrats Have Legalized Bush's Crimes
papananook
by papananook  6-29-2008   
 Beyond the breathtaking scope of this new authority, the Bush administration also snuck in a clause that granted forward-looking immunity from lawsuits to communications service providers that assisted the spying. That removed one of the few safeguards against Bush's warrantless wiretaps: the concern among service providers that they might be sued by customers for handing over constitutionally protected information without a warrant. In short, the "Protect America Act" made warrantless surveillance legally cost free for a collaborating service provider, tilting the scales even further in favor of the government's spying powers.
2
POPS
McShapeShifter
izzy3r
by izzy3r  6-24-2008   
 No Remarks
0
POPS
Big Pharma's Push To Drug Your Children
orgone_bosco
by orgone_bosco  6-16-2008   
 No Remarks
0
POPS
McCain- The Best Flip-Flopper Yet
klippety
by klippety  6-15-2008   
 If anybody remembers today what the man stood for 8 months ago..Compare with today..Yesterday.Any day. If he keeps flip-flopping like that, he won't even remember himself.
0
POPS
That Wacky Millennium Part XI (1789 - 1814)
revenantdm
by revenantdm  6-13-2008   
 French Revolution, Washington first Constitutional President, inventiveness galore and the War of 1812.
2
POPS
Closing the law-free zone "Guantanamo"
Yassin_M
by Yassin_M  6-13-2008    1
 In one sense, the decision in Boumediene v Bush is a limited one. It does not order the release of a single prisoner – indeed, no prisoner has been released by court order in the six years that men have been held at Guantanamo. Nor does it address the scope of the President's authority to hold individuals as "enemy combatants," what procedural protections they are owed, or how they should be treated. It simply opens the courthouse door. Six years after Guantanamo opened, detainees will finally get their day in court. As a result of that law, the Military Commissions Act, the court was confronted with the question of whether Guantanamo detainees have a constitutional right to habeas corpus, that is, one that cannot be taken away unless Congress suspends the writ in times of "rebellion or invasion." But reality was on the side of the detainees. Guantanamo has long become a symbol of Bush administration lawlessness in the "war on terror."
8
POPS
Supreme Court Rules Detainees Have Constitutional Rights
carrerinyes
by carrerinyes  6-13-2008    2
  Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote for the court majority: "The detainees in these cases are entitled to a prompt habeas corpus hearing. . . . Within the Constitution's separation-of-powers structure, few exercises of judicial power are as legitimate or as necessary as the responsibility to hear challenges to the authority of the executive to imprison a person." The court was narrowly split, 5 to 4. The dissenters accused the majority of meddling in a wartime matter better left to the president and the military. The decision "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed," Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in a dissent. President Bush said he would abide by the decision but added: "It was a deeply divided court, and I strongly agree with those who dissented." About 270 men are still held at Guantanamo. Fewer than 20 are now facing trial before a military commission, and about 60 are in the pipeline.
3
POPS
McCain Believes Wiretapping is Constitutional
rustajb
by rustajb  6-7-2008    1
 No Remarks
2
POPS
McCain's Two Positions on Wiretaps
Wisco
by Wisco  6-6-2008   
 Yeah, about that position -- it's kinda new and kinda 180 degrees off his previous position. Wonder why? Raw Story : While McCain's position on wiretaps and telcos is zigging this way and that, a new report also details the extent to which lobbyists who earned a living representing the very phone companies accused of breaking the law are now working for his campaign. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which is leading the charge against telco immunity and representing plaintiffs in several pending lawsuits, lays out the connections ... How awkward...
0
POPS
Intense article on "Main Core".....
mooner-one
by mooner-one  5-21-2008   
 .....sleep easy, baby!
5
POPS
Cheney lawyer claims Congress has no authority over vice-president
papananook
by papananook  4-29-2008    2
 No Remarks
1
POPS
Pakistan Moves To Ease Press Restrictions
Carl Lavin
by Carl Lavin  4-16-2008   
 Musharraf imposed strict limits on the press but voters rejected his politics and his policies. Now a little sun is starting to shine.
4
POPS
Will the Constitution Be Altered to Eliminate Key Liberties?
papananook
by papananook  4-14-2008    5
 No Remarks
6
POPS
Uphold Our Founding Fathers' Intent And TheTenth Amendment
merrie
by merrie  4-7-2008    3
 Force Congress to Cite Constitutional Authority for Bills! John Shadegg (R-AZ) has reintroduced H.R. 1359, the "Enumerated Powers Act", a bill that highlights the importance of the Tenth Amendment and forces a continual reexamination of the role of the federal government. As Barry Goldwater wrote in "The Conscience of a Conservative": "I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for......................."
0
POPS
Declassified memo authorized US to torture "enemy combatants"
manonfire4
by manonfire4  4-3-2008   
 No Remarks
0
POPS
Monarch presents: MK ULTRA Cults and SRA
WIDEEYECINEMA
by WIDEEYECINEMA  3-3-2008   
 No Remarks
6
POPS
Rule by fear or rule by law?
papananook
by papananook  2-23-2008    1
  The government has also contracted with several companies to build thousands of railcars, some reportedly equipped with shackles, ostensibly to transport detainees. According to diplomat and author Peter Dale Scott, the KBR contract is part of a Homeland Security plan titled ENDGAME, which sets as its goal the removal of "all removable aliens" and "potential terrorists." Fraud-busters such as Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, have complained about these contracts, saying that more taxpayer dollars should not go to taxpayer-gouging Halliburton. But the real question is: What kind of "new programs" require the construction and refurbishment of detention facilities in nearly every state of the union with the capacity to house perhaps millions of people? Sect. 1042 of the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies," gives the executive the power to invoke martial law. For the first time in more than a century, the presiden
5
POPS
Former Congressman Warns Of Martial Law Camps In America
Geshizar
by Geshizar  2-21-2008    5
 No Remarks
5
POPS
The 545 People Responsible For All Of U.S. Woes
Geshizar
by Geshizar  2-21-2008    6
 No Remarks
2
POPS
John McCain, Weak On Defense
merrie
by merrie  2-1-2008   
 The McCain approach would require a nation at war to allocate massive resources to processing the enemy through the court system. Interrogating the enemy McCain seized on endless reports in the New York Times about Abu Ghraib and the mistreatment of detainees at Guantanamo to push an amendment he attached to the Defense-appropriations bill conferring Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights on al Qaeda terrorists detained in Cuba. Ultimately, judges will be called upon to make what should be presidential war-making decisions. Having already challenged the detention and interrogation of the enemy, McCain said that he doesn't believe the president has the constitutional authority to intercept al Qaeda communications with possible saboteurs in the U.S. unless that authority is granted by Congress. Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and Franklin Roosevelt didn't seek congressional authority to secure intelligence because they had the power under the Constitution.
1
POPS
Bush bypasses defense act, part 2
masbury
by masbury  1-31-2008   
 refuses to obey law on whistle-blower protection, and investigation of contractor waste, mismanagement, use of excessive force.
4
POPS
Sen. Whitehouse reveals Bush claims to be above any Law..!
TJColatrella
by TJColatrella  12-10-2007   
 No Remarks
2
POPS
Bush says he determines what the law is
ekorstanje
by ekorstanje  12-8-2007   
 Is this a man that is loyal to the constitution or the Republic?
1
POPS
Bush determines what Is Constitutional..!
TJColatrella
by TJColatrella  12-7-2007   
 No Remarks
— end of the list —
Get widget

Constitutional authority  

loading clips...
rss tools
Clipmarks
About   Clippers   Blog   Privacy   EULA   Copyright   Site Map   Forbes Digital

OK